C 61/40
Template for the encoding of the Gascon Rolls
- 1
-
1328, 28 January. York Eboracum. For Robert de Lisle.
Order to the seneschal of Gascony or his lieutenant, as Robert de Lisle Insula heads for several places in regions of the mainland for a pilgrimage and as he was going to places of the duchy, to receive him well according to his status and to not permit to the king's subjects to molest or trouble him or his goods.
- 2
-
27 January. York Eboracum. For William de Cheyny.
Order to the seneschal of Gascony to hear the complaint of William de Cheyny and do him swift justice, as executor of Robert de Shirland Shirlande, former mayor of the city of Bordeaux Burdegala 1 to whom Ramon Léon Leonis, former sub-mayor of the said city, the jurats and the commune of the said city granted by their letters patent under the city's seal to Shirland as a reward for his service 200l.t. to be paid to him or his subsitute at specified dates, which were not been paid until now, so that he has not to complain anymore to the king.
- 1.
- Robert de Shirland was mayor of Bordeaux in 1323.
- 3
-
15 February. York Eboracum. For the consuls and commune of the town of Penne-d'Agenais.
Order to the seneschal of Gascony, as the consuls and community of Penne-d'Agenais Penna in Agenesio requested the king by letters under the duchy's seal to grant them a license to receive the toll on the salt coming through the town of Penne-d'Agenais and in its district by land as well as by water, to grant it at pleasure, as Edmund, earl of Kent, former king's lieutenant of Edward II in the duchy formerly granted it.
By C.
- 4
-
15 February. York Eboracum. For the same.
Order to the seneschal of Gascony, as the consuls and community of the town of Penne-d'Agenais Penna in Agenesio petitioned the king to have a sufficient bayle to keep their rights and liberties, to take advice from the king's council in the duchy and to keep the current bayle or, if he is not sufficient, for maintaining the king's and the town's rights, to appoint another.
By C.
- 5
-
Same as above. For the same.
Order to the seneschal of Gascony, as the consuls and community of Penne-d'Agenais Penna in Agenesio have been granted taxation for four years on the goods coming to their town by Arnaut de Durfort de Duro Forti, former seneschal of Agenais Agenesium for Edward II, after damages sustained during the last war 1 , to enclose again the town, and as they have petitioned the king for a further taxation, to allow them to levy it for seven years, four years to build the gates and three to close the town.
By C.
- 1.
- The war of St-Sardos, 1324-5
- 6
-
Same as above. For the same.
Order to the seneschal of Gascony to protect and defend the consuls and community of Penne-d'Agenais Penna in Agenesio against injuries, oppressions and violences and also the rights and liberties of the said town.
By C.
- 7
-
1328, 15 February. York Eboracum. For the same.
Order to the seneschal of Gascony and the constable of Bordeaux as consuls and men of the town of Penne-d'Agenais Penna in Agenesio 1 complained that their goods have been seized in the king of France's possessions after the goods of the French were seized by [the future]Edward III as duke of Aquitaine during the war against Edward II 2 , and applied to his use by the constable of Bordeaux, to have advice with those who had been in Saint-Macaire Sanctus Macarius with William [Ayermine], bishop of Norwich who had been sent in Aquitaine by the king, to take useful provision for the consuls' and town's benefit, according to the aforesaid bishop's provisions on similar matters, based on the late agreement between the king and the French,
By C.
- 1.
- In the text Penne et Agen' for Penne in Agen'.
- 2.
- The war of St-Sardos, 1324-5.
- 8
-
29 February. York Eboracum. For Ramon de Branne.
Order to the constable of Bordeaux to pay from the revenues of the duchy to Ramon de Branne de Brana or his substitute Gaucem Pagan Pagani the sum of 70l. 14d.ch. or its value in another currency as Edward II ordered by his letters patent on 24 June 1316 to the constable of Bordeaux to pay from the revenues of the duchy this sum to Branne 1 , sum which was the remain of the sum of 25l.ch. that Edward I granted to Branne by his letters patent for his maintenance in England until he recovered his lands and tenements seized by the king of France during the war between him and Edward I 2 as it is shown by the account made with Branne by John de Sandale de Sandale. But this sum of 70l. 14d.ch. has not been paid to Branne until now because the revenues of the duchy were then in the hands of others by the grant of Edward II, so that Gaucem Pagan, Branne's substitute on this business, petitioned the king before him and his council to pay this sum to Branne. The constable has to receive from Branne or his subsitute the letters of Edward II and Branne's letters of acquittances.
By C.
- 1.
- See RG IV, no.1666 III, p.485.
- 2.
- The war of Gascony, 1294-7/1303.
- 8.1
-
There John [Hotham], bishop [of Ely], then king's chancellor, has returned the king's great seal as it is explained in the memorandum copied in the Close Rolls of the same year [(second year of Edward III)]. 1
- 1.
- The same note is copied on the dorse of membrane 9.
- 9
-
5 March. York Eboracum. For William Butley.
Appointment for life to William Butley Butuyleyn, chaplain, of the chantry of the king's chapel in the king's castle of Bordeaux Burdegala 1 .
By p.s.
- 1.
- The castle of the Ombrière of Bordeaux.
- 10
-
Same as above.
And it is ordered to the seneschal of Gascony or his lieutenant to deliver without delay to William [Butley] the aforesaid chantry with its rights and appurtenances, according to the content of the king's letters.
By p.s.
- 11
-
1328, 5 March. York Eboracum. For Ramon de Mercadiel.
Order to the seneschal of Gascony to inquiry on the following matter and find the truth: Ramon de Mercadiel de Mercandili, de Mercandili burgess and merchant of the town of Penne-d'Agenais la Penna in Agennesio petitioned the king before him and his council that because of the prosecution of some of his ennemies he has been wrongly accused of the killing of Estèbe Donadieu Donodei and Johan de Caillavet Cailliaveto next to Agen Agennum in the king of France's jurisdiction and the goods of Mercadiel were seized in the king of England's hand to Mercadiel's damage. The king wants to give back to Mercadiel his goods and order the seneschal to inquiry on this matter according to the law and the local fors and customs.
By petition of C.
- 12
-
20 February. York Eboracum. For Bernat Estève, archdeacon of Figeac and Ramon, his brother.
Grant forever to Ramon [Estève] and his heirs of an annuity of 10l.st. from places in the baylie of Villefranche[-du-Périgord] Ville Franche or the baylie of Cazals Casales previously given for life to him and his brother Bernat Estève Stephani, Stephani archdeacon of Figeac Fygiaco by Edward II on 13 March 1327 1
By p.s.
- 1.
- For a related entry, see entry 27 in C 61/39.
- 13
-
Same as above.
And it is ordered to the seneschal of Gascony to allocate 10 librates to Ramon [Estève] on these baylies.
- 14
-
1328, 6 March. York Eboracum. For Arnaut de Durfort.
1Order to the king's seneschals, constables, castellans, prévôts, bayles, ministers and king's liege men of the duchy, as the king took in his safeguard for two years Arnaut de Durfort Duro Forti, lord of the castles of Frespech de Fessi Podi, Duro Forti Bordiels de Bordilis and Duro Forti Pépinès Podium Pinisum to maintain and protect Durfort's men, things and all this legitimate possessions in the duchy from unlawfull injuries and violence according to their competence. And if anything has been recently unlawfully attempted against them, they have to repeal it and correct it without delay.
- 1.
- SC 8/181/9029 is the petition of Arnaut de Durfort requesting this safeguard. Published in Peña (1977), I, p.319, no.505.
- 15
-
8 March. York. For Dénot, lord of Doazit.
Order to the constable of Bordeaux to account with Dénot [de Doazit], lord of Doazit Doset, the wages owed to him from the past, as this latter petitioned the king on this matter before him and his coucil, and pay him according to what he finds suitable. The constable will have due allowance in his account.
- 16
-
6 March. York Eboracum. For Arnaut de Durfort.
1Order to the constable, as Arnaut de Durfort de Duro Forti petitioned the king before him and his council that arrears of his wages were owed to him from the time of his service to Edward II and the current king in the last wars in the duchy as well as the 'restor' of his horses lost during this service, to account with the aforesaid Durfort of his wages from this period and of the 'restor' of his horses and to pay them from the issues of the duchy. The constable will have due allowance in his account.
By petition of C.
- 1.
- SC 8/43/2146 is the petition of Arnaut de Durfort requesting the payment of arrears and the 'restor' of horses. Published in Peña (1977), I, p.319-20, no.506.
- 17
- 18
-
Same as above. For Bertran Caillau.
The same for Bertran Caillau, bourgeois de Bordeaux Calculi, Burdegala.
- 19
-
1328, 8 March. York Eboracum. For Arnaut Amanieu.
Order to the constable, as Arnaut Amanieu Amaneu petitioned the king before him and his council that 200l.t. were owed to him for the 'restor' of his horses from the time of his service to Edward II and the current king in the last war in the duchy, to account with the aforesaid Amanieu what is owed to him and to pay him from the issues of the duchy. The constable will have due allowance in his account.
By petition of C.
- 20
-
8 March. York Eboracum. For Galhart Assalit.
1Order to the constable, as Galhart Assalit Assailhit petitioned the king that the king owed to him several sums from the time he was keeper of the king's castle of Blaye Blavia, as appears in bills of the king's clerks Adam de Limber Lymbergh and John Travers, former constables of Bordeaux, to check the aforesaid bills and to pay him the owed sums in order this complaint does not reach the king again. The constable will have due allowance in his account.
By petition of C.
- 1.
- SC 8/290/14473 is the petition of Galhart Assalit at the origin of this act. Assalit explained there that Edward II granted him the keepership of the castle of Blaye which value was 193l.parv.t per year. But he was removed from this office and this keepership was given to someone else. Because of this keepership, it is owed to him 350l. 10s.parv.t. from the time Adam de Limber was constable of Bordeaux, as appears in a bill of this latter sealed with his seal, and Edward II ordered this constable by his letters patent to pay this sum. It is owed to him also 51l. 10s.parv.t. from the time John Travers was constable of Bordeaux and as appears in a bill of this latter sealed with his seal. But none of these sums have been paid to him, so he requested to be paid. Edward II granted to Assalit the 'hundred de Berstow' in Nottinghamshire worths 22l.st. per year, but he lost this allowance since the coronation of Edward III.
- 21
-
8 March. York. For Thomas de Studley.
Grant at pleasure to Thomas de Studley of Bordeaux Burdegala, king's serjeant, because of his service to Edward II and the current king in the regions of the duchy, of the small custom of the house of the merchants of Bordeaux under the same conditions than others hold it.
By petition of C.
- 22
-
Same as above.
And it is ordered to the seneschal of Gascony and the constable of Bordeaux to deliver in this form the aforesaid custom to Thomas de Studley.
By petition of C.
- 23
-
1328, 6 March. York. For Eugènia de Bouglon , widow.
Order to the seneschal of Gascony and the constable of Bordeaux to have full information on this matter: Eugènia de Bouglon de Boglon, widow, petitioned the king before him and his council that during the war between Edward II and the king of France 1 Edmund, earl of Kent, then lieutenant of Edward II in the duchy, seized in the king's hand the lands and tenements of the aforesaid Bouglon in Latresne La Trene in Bordelais Burdegalesium because the said Bouglon was then in the region of Agenais Agennesium, and Kent granted them to Guilhem-Sants [II de Pommiers], lord of Pommiers de Pomeriis under certain conditions. She requested to have this lands and tenements of Latresne returned. The seneschal and constable have to inform themselves on the conduct of Bouglon during the war and if these lands and tenements are her heritage, then they have to certify the king on this matter under the king's seal in use in the duchy.
By petition of C.
- 1.
- The war of St-Sardos, 1324-5.
-
Here John [de Hotham], bishop [of Ely], then chancellor, delivered the great seal to the king, just as appears in the memorandum on the dorse of the close rolls for the same year. 1
- 1.
- This memorandum (1 March 1328) is in CCR, 1327-1330, p. 371.
- 24
-
6 March. York.For Master Pey Duluc.
Order to the seneschal of Gascony and the constable of Bordeaux to check the inquiry of a previous seneschal of Gascony on this matter: Formerly, Pey Duluc Master de Luco 1 , nephew of the cardinal [Arnaut] de Pellegrue 2 , complained to the king when this latter was in the regions of France Francia, asserting that some king's officials and ministers of the duchy seized in the king's hand, at the time of the war between Edward II and the king of France 3 , his hereditary lands and tenements and his goods and chattels being in the duchy because he was then at the university of Orléans Aurelianensis, in the lordship of the king of France. The king ordered then to the then seneschal of Gascony to do an information on the reasons of this seizure, and if they had been seized, they had to be given back to Duluc without delay. The seneschal did the information and it appeared that Duluc said the truth, but the seneschal did not give back his goods to Duluc to this latter's great damage and against the king's order. On what, the aforesaid Duluc petitioned the king before him and his council to provide him with a remedy. If the information of the former seneschal of Gascony shows that the lands, tenements, goods and chattels of Duluc have to be given back to him, then they have to return them to Duluc according to the content of the king's order. And if the information shows that Duluc's lands, tenements, goods and chattels have been not reasonably seized in the king's hand, then they have to give back them to Duluc or his substitute without delay.
By petition of C.
- 1.
- There is a biographical entry about him in FEG, no. BO534. Archbishop of Bordeaux, 1332 - 1345.
- 2.
- On Arnaut de Pellegrue, see FEG, no. BO818 and AG276. He was created cardinal in 1305, d. before 1332. On this cardinal see: See Duchesne, F., Histoire de tous les cardinaux françois de naissance, I (Paris, 1660), p.361-3. Book downloadable on: http://gallica.bnf.fr/ and data on him on: http://www.fiu.edu/~mirandas/bios1305.htm#Pellegrue
- 3.
- The war of St-Sardos, 1324-5.
- 25
-
Same as above. For Auger de Dussolle and Galhart de Dussolle.
Order to the constable, as Auger de Dussolle Dosowe and Galhart de Dussolle Dosowe 1 petitioned the king before him and his council that arrears of their wages were owed to them from the time of their service to Edward II and the current king in the last wars in the duchy as well as the 'restor' of his horses lost during this service, to account with the aforesaid Auger and Galhart of their wages from this period and of the 'restor' of his horses and to pay them from the issues of the duchy, receiving from them their letters of acquittance. The constable will have due allowance in his account.
By petition of C.
- 1.
- The Galhart de "Dosowe" of this entry is also named as "Dunsoldz" or "Dunssoudz" in other parts of the Gascon Rolls. It is probably the placename Dussolle.
- 25.1
-
Same as above.
1The same for Pey de Gabarret Gawaret
- 1.
- This is maybe the petition SC 8/287/14 331 where Gabarret requests the king to pay his wages (810l.t. from the time Oliver de Ingham was seneschal of Gascony is at the origin of this act.
- 25.2
-
Same as above.
The same for Ramon Durand Duran.
- 25.3
-
Same as above.
The same for Guiraut de Tastes.
- 25.4
-
Same as above.
1The same for Séguina, widow of Bertran Galard Gailard and her executrix.
- 1.
- SC 8/49/2426 is her petition where she requests the king to pay the wages of his late husband dating from the time John Travers was constable of Bordeaux.
- 26
-
Same as above. For Ramon de Mercadiel.
1Order to the seneschal of Gascony to inquiry on the following matter and find the truth: Ramon de Mercadiel Mercandili, Mercandili burgess and merchant of the town of Penne-d'Agenais la Penna in Agennesio petitioned the king before him and his council that because of the prosecution of some of his ennemies he has been wrongly accused of the killing of Estèbe Donadieu Bonedei and Johan de Caillavet Cailliaveto, de next to Agen Agennesium in the king of France's jurisdiction, and the goods of Mercadiel were seized in the king of England's hand. The king wants to give back to Mercadiel his goods and order the seneschal to inquiry on this matter according to the local customs.
By petition of C.
- 1.
- Same entry as above entry no.11, m.9.
- 27
-
1328, 8 March. York Eboracum. For Ramon-Guilhem Daulet.
2Order to the constable of Bordeaux to check the receipts mentioned down there: Ramon-Guilhem Daulet Dauled petitioned the king before him and his council that at the beginning of the last war in the duchy 1 , when Lord Charles [de Valois] besieged La Réole La Riole, he had in farm the baylie of the bastide of Sauveterre[-de-Guyenne] Salveterre in Bazadais Basedes on which he had to render each year 360l.b. to the constable of Bordeaux, paying 180l. at Easter and 180l. at Michaelmas. But he paid nothing because the French entered in Sauveterre a long time before Michaelmas, so Daulet owed the most part of this second term as he was unable to levy anything. The king orders the constable that, after an information, the 180l. 13s.t. owed to Daulet for his wages, as appears by two receipts under the seal of the constable of Bordeaux, be withdrawn from the sum owed by Daulet for this farm and to release Daulet from the farm of the second term. The constable will have due allowance in his account.
By petition of C.
- 1.
- The war of St-Sardos, 1324-5.
- 2.
- This entry follows the petition SC 8/290/14 476 of Ramon-Guilhem Daulet (written in Anglo-French) on this matter. However, some complementary information can be found in this petition: Daulet specifies he was in La Réole with the earl of Kent when this town was besieged by Charles de Valois. The date of the second term is there All Saints and not Michaelmas. His owed wages amouting to 180l. 13s.t. are to be found in two receipts of John Weston, constable of Bordeaux. Of the payment of the second term, Daulet had only received half of it because on the day of St Barthélemy (24 August) the French entered Sauveterre, stole him 200l. and killed six of his men. Furthermore, he was not paid of what he had to earn from this baylie and thus request the king to order the constable to pay him what was agreed in the charters.
- 28
-
8 March. York Eboracum. For Pey de Galician.
Order to John Weston, constable of Bordeaux, as the king sent Pey de Galician Master Galiciano, king's clerk 1 , to the regions of the duchy and some other neighbouring regions for some king's business, to believe what he says on behalf of the king and to provide him with advice and help, to pay his expenses from the issues of the duchy as long he is in the king's service there by the mean of indetures made between him and Galician.
- 1.
- Pey de Galician, canon of Agen, 1310 - 1332. He hold several other benefices in Agenais and was also canon of Rouen and later canon of Chichester and Salisbury. See FEG, no. AG374 and RO1097.
- 29
-
8 March. York Eboracum. For Arnaut-Guilhem de Béarn, lord of Lescun and Bernat de Béarn.
Order to the constable of Bordeaux, as Arnaut-Guilhem de Béarn Bearino, Bearino lord of Lescun Lescuno and his brother Bernat de Béarn called l'Aspès Bearino petitioned the king before him and his council to have paid the wages owed to them in the duchy, to account with them what is owed to them, then to pay them the owed sum as much as he can. The constable will have due allowance in his account.
By petition of C.
- 30
-
8 March. York Eboracum. For Aubert Mège.
3Order to the seneschal of Gascony and the constable of Bordeaux to call the members of the king's council of the duchy they find suitable to be called on this matter: Aubert Mège, king's clerk Medici 1 , is so old that he cannot travel to England to render his account from the time he was constable of Bordeaux by the mandate of Edward II who acted then as governor and administrator of the things and goods of the future current king in the duchy. 2 The seneschal and constable have to gather at Bordeaux some king's trustworthy liege men of this region to audit and certify Mège's account under the king's seal in use in the duchy. The seneschal and the constable have to certify the king of the expenses and revenues of this account under their seals.
By petition of C.
- 1.
- Aubert Mège was canon of Bordeaux, 1341 - 1345 (d. 1345). See FEG, no. BO538.
- 2.
- The future Edward III was duke of Aquitaine in 1326-7, but his father controlled in his name the duchy.
- 3.
- Two petitions of Aubert Mège requested he had his account audited at Bordeaux: - in SC 8/288/14 394, he specifies he accepted the office of constable of Bordeaux from Edward II only because he obtained the promise to render his account only in Bordeaux. He requested there Edward III to give auditors for his account among the members of the king's council of Gascony, that are clerks, barons or nobles of the Gascon regions who know how Mège behave as constable. They have to give full acquittance to Mège's account on behalf of the king as Mège is not enough courageous to go over to France and as he does not endure sea travel. - in SC 8/289/14436, Mège explained he kept longer the office of constable of Bordeaux without transmiting it to his successor to protest in order to obtain that auditors be sent to Bordeaux to check his account as constable. He cannot travel because he has a 'secret disease'.
- 31
-
Same as above. For Guiraut de Tastes.
Order to the seneschal of Gascony and the constable of Bordeaux to call the members of the king's council of the duchy to have full information on this matter: Guiraut de Tastes Tastys petitioned the king before him and his council that he holds from the king the parish of Sainte-Croix-du-Mont Sancta Crux de Monte in fief rendering per year at Michaelmas a pair of gloves to the current king and his heirs. Similarly, Tastes and his predecessors, lords of the castle of Sainte-Croix-du-Mont perceived, there is no memory of the contrary, as such 5s. as fine for whatever slap given without bloodshed and 65s. for whatever wound given. So Tastes requested the king to enjoy this right as did his predecessors. If by the information or another way, the seneschal and constable notice that Tastes and predecessors always enjoyed this right, so they have to permit him to enjoy it. If some king's ministers of the duchy made some impediments against this right, they have to remove these impediments without delay in keeping the king's right.
- 32
-
1328, 10 March. York Eboracum. For Pey de Moncaut.
Order to the constable of Bordeaux, as Pey de Moncaut Mons Cavus petitioned the king that this latter owed him 900l. for his wages of different periods as well as for the 'restor' of his horses lost in the king's service as shown by two receipts under the seal of the constable of Bordeaux, to check these receipts and to pay him what is owed to him. The constable will have due allowance in his account.
By petition of C.
- 33
-
8 March. York Eboracum. For Laurens de Bielle of Bayonne.
Order to the constable of Bordeaux, as Laurens de Bielle Villa, de of Bayonne Baiona petitioned the king because following the order of Oliver de Ingham, former seneschal of the duchy, he kept men-at-arms at the king's wages in his baylie of Labourd La Tort and 243l.t. that are still owed to him, to account with Bielle and to pay him what is owed to him. The constable will have due allowance in his account.
By petition of C.
- 34
-
6 March. York. For Eugènia de Bouglon.
2Order to the seneschal of Gascony and the constable of Bordeaux to have full information on this matter: Eugènia de Bouglon Boglou, widow, petitioned the king before him and his council that during the war between Edward II and the king of France 1 Edmund [of Woodstock], earl of Kent, uncle of the current king and then lieutenant of Edward II in the duchy, seized in the king's hand the lands and tenements of the aforesaid Bouglon in Latresne la Trene in Bordelais Burdegalesio because the said Bouglon was then in the region of Agenais Agenn' , and Kent granted them to Guilhem-Sants [II de Pommiers], lord of Pommiers Pomeriis under some conditions. She requested to have this lands and tenements of Latresne returned. The seneschal and constable have to inform themselves on the conduct of Bouglon during the war and if these lands and tenements are her heritage, then they have to certify the king on this matter under the king's seal in use in the duchy.
By petition of C.
- 1.
- The war of St-Sardos, 1324-5.
- 2.
- The same entry is on m.9, entry no.23.
- 35
-
24 March. Lincoln. Concerning safeguard for Master Johan Guitard
Order to the king's seneschals, constables, castellans, prévôts, bayles, ministers and king's liege men of the duchy, as the king took in his safeguard Johan Guitard Master Guytard for one year, to maintain and protect Guitard's men, lands, things, revenues and all his possessions in the duchy from unlawfull injuries and violence according to their competence. And if anything has been recently unlawfully attempted against them, they have to repeal it and correct it without delay.
By K.
- 36
-
Grant at pleasure Peter de Loveny, because of his good service to Edward II and the current king, of the office of serjeant (officium seriantie) of the [castle of the]Ombrière of Bordeaux Umbrarie, perceiving in this office what was used to be perceived by others who had this office.
By p.s.
- 1.
- It is written extractus in the margin.
- 37
-
30 March. Navenby. For Arnaut-Gassie.
Grant for life, at the request of Edmund [of Woodstock], earl of Kent, to Arnaut-Gassie de Saint-Jean Sancto Johanne, de the keepership of the king's castle of Montendre Mountendre, perceiving there the customary wages.
By p.s.
- 38
-
Same as above.
And it is ordered to the seneschal of Gascony to deliver the keepership of the castle of Montendre to the aforesaid Arnaut[-Gassie de Saint-Jean].
- 39
-
Same as above.
And it is ordered to the constable of Bordeaux to pay the customary wages from the issues of the duchy.
- 40
-
1328, 9 March. York Eboracum.
Letter to Bérart d'Albret La Breto, La Breto lord of Vayres, de Variis, requesting him to believe what says Master Pey de Galician Galiciano, Galiciano canon of Agen Agen', on behalf of the king.
-
In the same way it is written to:
- 40.1
-
Same as above.
Pey[II] de GraillyGrylino, vicomte of Benauges ; Guilhem de Caumont Cavus Mons, Cavus Mons lord of Caumont Cavus Mons; Arnaut-Guilhem de Béarn Bearn, Bearn lord of Lescun del Sku; Bernat de Béarn called l'Aspès Bernio, de, Laspes; Sir Arnaut de Durfort Duro Forti, de, Duro Forti, de lord of Frespech Fyspuch; Sir Amaniu du Foussat Fossato, Fossato lord of Madaillan Madeylano, de; Guilhem-Sants[II] de PommiersPomeriis, de, Pomeriis, de lord of Pommiers Pomeriis, de; Arnaut de Montpezat Monte Pesato, Monte Pesato lord of Aiguillon Aculeum; Bertran Coudène Master Codene; Sir Arnaut-Gassie du Foussat Fassato, de, Fassato, de lord of Thouars Tuars; Sir Ramon Durand Durandi, Durandi seneschal of the Landes Lande; Pey de Castelnau, lord of Castelnau[-Tursan]Castrum Novum; Sir Fortaner d'Esgoarrebaque Garrevake, de ; Bernat de Lesparre La Sparra 1 ; the lord of Castillon-Médoc Castelhone de Medolc; the lord of Langoiran Lugurano; Guilhem-Amaniu de Madaillan Madelano, de, Madelano, de lord of Rauzan Resanum; Pey Caillau Calculi; the lord of Landiras Landirano and the lady of Landiras, his mother; Pey de Gabarret Gavereio; Guilhem-Ramon de Caumont Cavus Mons; Amaniu Colom Colum; Johan Colom Colum; Bertran Caillau Calculi; Bonet de Soulé Solerio; Pey de Soulé Solerio; Arnaut de Lalande La Lande; Bernat d'Aillan Aylano; Johan de Mauléon Malus Lio; Hélias de Pommiers Master Pomeriis 2 ; Ramon Bidau Vitali; Guiraut de Latour Master Turre; Ramon Guiraudon Guiraudoin; Ramon-Martin de St-Pierre Sancto Petro;
- 1.
- The Gascon Roll names him as domino de la Sparre, but it is an error as the lord of Lesparre was then Sénébrun IV de Lesparre.
- 2.
- See FEG, BO549, canon of Bordeaux c. 1332 - 1359.
- 40.2
-
Same as above.
Aubert Mège Master Medici ; Johan Guitard Master Guitardi; Austens Jourdain Master Jordani; Guiraut Dupuch Master del Puch 1 ; the consuls of the town of Blaye Blaies and its castellan; the mayor and jurats of the castle of Bourg Burgum; the mayor and jurats of Libourne Leybourn'; Badin Dufour de Furno, de Furno bayle of Libourne Leybourn' 2 ; the mayor and jurats of Saint-Émilion Sanctus Milio; the mayor and jurats of Saint-Macaire Sanctus Makaris; the mayor and jurats of the town of Bayonne Bayona; Laurens de Bielle Villa; the mayor and jurats of the city of Dax Aquensis ; the bishop of Bayonne Baiona; the bishop and chapter of Dax Aquensis; the mayor and jurats of Saint-Sever Sanctus Cyverius; Sants Bouniort Bounioch; Johan Dardy Dardingg'; Bernat de Bielle Vila; Per-Arnaut de Bielle Vylla; Master Per-Arnaut de Taller Taller'; the lord of Sault Sancho; the consuls and community of the town of Penne-d'Agenais Penna; the consuls and community of Puymirol Grande Castrum; II de Durfort[Ramfré 3 ]Duro Forti, Duro Forti lord of Bajamont Baiolmont; Ramon-Bernat de Durfort, damoiseau Duro Forti.
- 1.
- See FEG, BO521, canon of Bordeaux from 1342, sacristan of Bordeaux 1350-1346 and appointed archdeacon of Blaye in 1345 and bishop of Bazas in 1359 (d. 1360).
- 2.
- On Badin Dufour of Bayonne also called Guilhem Dufour or Guilhem Badin later dismissed from Edward III's favour and who visited the Middle East for the duke of Bourbon, see L. de La Roncière and L. Dorez, 'Lettres inédites et mémoires de Marino Sanudo l'Ancien', Bibliothèque de l'École de Chartes, 56 (1895), p. 31, n.3,4 and 5, p. 34 and 39
- 3.
- The original text mistakenly writes Duro Forti de Duro Forti
- 41
-
Same as above.
Letter to the community of Bordeaux Burdegala praising their faithfulness towards the king and enjoining it to continue to be faithful.
-
In the same way it is written to:
- 41.1
-
Same as above.
the community of Bayonne Baiona; the community of Saint-Sever Sanctus Cyverius; the community of Saint-Macaire Sanctus Makaris; the community of Dax Aquensis;
- 41.2
-
Same as above.
the community of Saint-Émilion Sanctus Milio; the community of Bourg Burgh; the community of Blaye Blayes; the community of Saintes Xaunctes;
- 41.3
-
Same as above.
the community of the town of Penne[-d'Agenais] Penna; the community of Puymirol Peumirol; the community of Castillonnès Chastelon'.
- 42
-
Same as above.
Letter to the archbishop of Bordeaux Burdegalensis requesting him to believe what says Pey de Galician Master Galiciano, Galiciano canon of Agen Agennensis on behalf of the king.
-
In the same way it is written to:
- 42.1
-
Same as above.
The bishop of Agen Agennensis; the bishop of Condom Condomensis; the bishop of Lectoure Lectorensis; the bishop of Bazas Vasetensis; the consuls and city of Agen Agennensis; Pey de Marque Marchia, citizen of Agen; Arnaut de Cassagne Cassanea, citizen of Agen; Ramon de Cassagne Cassanea, citizen of Agen; Guilhem de Talive Talliva, citizen of Agen; Bertran Topyne, citizen of Agen; Arnaut de Prades, citizen of Agen Prados; Lord Bernat de Cassagne Cassanea, citizen of Agen; Lord Guilhem de Cazes Cases; Arnaut de Gaillac Master Gaylaco, de, professor in laws; Arnaut de Donadieu Master Dono Dei; the consuls and community of Condom Condomensis; Sir Ramon Oussel Oselli, professor in laws;
- 42.2
-
Same as above.
Gauter de Mateu Matheuo, Matheuo citizen of Condom Condomensis; the consuls and community of Lectoure Lectorensis; Sir Johan Alègre Alegr', kt; the prévôt and community of Bazas Vasatensis; Bernat-Etz de Ladils La Dils, La Dils citizen of Bazas Vasatensis; Johan de Latour Turre, citizen of Bazas; the jurats and community of the town of La Réole Regula; the consuls and commune of the town of Sainte-Bazeille Sancta Basillia; Boson de Grignols Gronnoliis; the consuls and community of the town of Marmande; Bernat Élies Master Elie, burgess of Marmande; Master Pey de Brax Braxs, burgess of Marmande; Bidot Fisson Fissonis, burgess of Marmande; the consuls of the town of Le Mas-d'Agenais Mansum Agennensis; Sir Séguin de Barbotan Borbatano,Borbatano prior of Le Mas-d'Agenais Mansum ; Sir Guilhem-Aymeric de Barbotan, kt 1 ; the consuls of the town of Tonneins Toyngges;
- 1.
- This person is person is probably a Guilhem-Aymeric. The English scribe wrote Guillelmus Erevici because of a confusion with the English surname Erevicus.
- 42.3
-
Same as above.
Sir Estèbe Ferréol Ferioli, kt; Révignan Rovynarius , lord [Tonneins] 1 ; the consuls of the town of Aiguillon Aculeum; Sir Arnaut-Gassie du Foussat, kt Fossato, de; the consuls of the town of Port-Sainte-Marie Portus Sancte Marie; Bertran de Lucbon Luco Bono, de; Arnaut-Gassie de Lucbon Luco Bono, de; Brunet de Préchac Pressaco 2 ; Johan de Camps Campis, de; the consuls of Villeneuve[-sur-Lot] Villa Nova; Per-Guilhem de Chonal; Johan Bret; the consuls of the town of the castle of Monflanquin Mons Flakyn; Master Pey de Bello Videre; the consuls and community of the castle of Tournon[-d'Agenais] Torno; the consuls and community of the town of Mézin Medicinum ; Pey de Rival Ryvali, de; Bernat de Barès Baresio, de; Pey de Paylers, burgess of Marmande; 3
- 1.
- Lord of Tonneins. Révignan or Rovignan is the name of a noble family whose some members were co-lords of Tonneins with members of the Ferréol's family. Obviously, the copist forgot the christian name of this Rovignan.
- 2.
- The text writes "Prunetus de Pressac", but it is an error as this name does not exist in Gascony and should be corrected into "Brunetus" hence Brunet in Gascon.
- 3.
- A note explains that this list continues down there (see entry no.45) and begins with: Lord Jordan de l'Isle, the lord of l'Isle [-Jourdain].
- 43
-
Same as above.
Letter to Arnaut de Durfort Duro Forti, de 1 where the king explained he supplicated the former king of France, his uncle 2 to nullify his banishment 3 but it did not succeed because of the death of this latter [(in 1328)]. The king asks Durfort to take patience until he had managed to obtain the revocation of his banishment. He wrote to the constable of Bordeaux to account with him and to pay what is owed to him.
- 1.
- Lord of Frespech, Bordiels and Pépinès (dép. Lot-et-Garonne).
- 2.
- Charles IV.
- 3.
- See C 61/39, entries no.84.1 and 85.
- 44
-
. Cancelled because [it has been copied] in the Close [Rolls].
Letter to Alfonso [XI], king of Castile , kinsman of the king, about the complaint of Gerald de Byole, merchant of Southampton Suthampton', loaded at La Rochelle la Rochele on a certain ship called 'la St-Nicholas' of Calais Calesio on which William le Butor was Master 26 tuns of white wine and one pipe... 1
- 1.
- This entry is not complete as this act has been copied in the Close Rolls.
- 45
-
Same as above. [A note situated at the end of entry no.42 explains that this list is the continuation of the list of this latter entry.]
Sir Jordan de l'Isle Insula, Insula lord of l'Isle[-Jourdain] Insula; the count of Foix Fuxensis; the count of Comminges Convenae; the count of Armagnac Armyniacum; the count of Périgord Petragorisensis; the lord of Bergerac Bragiceriacum; Bernat-Etz[V] d'AlbretLa Bretum, La Bretum lord of Albret La Bretum; Guitard d'Albret La Bretum, vicomte of Tartas; Anessans de Piis Pinibus, Pinibus lord of Moncrabeau Mons Crabellus; Sir Amaniu de Noaillan Noylano, de, Noylano, de lord of Sainte-Livrade[-sur-Lot] Sancta Liberata; Ramon de Fargues Farges, Farges lord of Mauvezin -sur-Gupie, Malus Vicinus; Bernat de Révignan Ruvynano, de, Ruvynano, de lord of Castelculier Castrum Coillerum; Bertran de Lamothe la Mote, la Mote lord of Clermont[-Dessous] Clarus Mons ; Ponts Amanieu Amaneo, Amaneo lord of Montastruc Mons Estrucus ;
- 45.1
-
Same as above.
Sir Bertran de Durfort Duro Forti, lord of Clermont[-Soubiran] Clarus Mons; Lord Bertran de Fumel Fumello, de, Fumello, de lord of Pujols Puiollii; Bernat Trenquéléon Trenchelyon, Trenchelyon lord of Gazaupouy Gaseum Podeum; Sir Guiraut d'Armagnac Ermyniaco, de, Ermyniaco, de vicomte of Brulhois Bruylessie; Pey de Moncaut, lord of Moncaut Monchaup' Monchaup'; Galhart de Malèze Maylesche; Sir Béguer de Magnac Maynacum; Assiu de Galard Galardo de,; Amaniu de Pellegrue Pelagrua; Lorc de Sancti Petri de Serr'; Gaston de Gollyngs, lord of Cuq Cucum; Sir Huc de Huguet Hugeto, de; Sir Guilhem-Amaniu, lord of Roquefort Rokefort;
- 45.2
-
Same as above.
Arnaut d'Esparbès Sperveriis, de; Bézian d'Allemans Almania, de; Arnaut de Latour Turre, de; Sir Bertran de Latour Turre, de, Turre, de canon of Agen Agennensis 1 ; the lord of Gramont Ager Mons; Guilhem d'Andoins Andoniis, Andoniis lord of Andoins Andoniis; the chapter of Saint-Étienne of Agen Sanctus Stephanus, Agenn'; the chapter of Saint-Caprais Sanctus Crapassius of Sanctus Crapassius Agen Agenn'; Sir Guillelmus de Bussi, archdeacon of Brulhois Brulliensis; Sir Per-Arnaut de Lacaze la Case.
- 1.
- He was canon of Agen, 1317 - 1332, he possessed several other benefices, chaplain of the pope John XXII, nephew of cardinal Bertran de Latour. See FEG, AG206
- 46
-
1328, 28 March. Lincoln Nicole.
Letter to María [Díaz I de Haro], lady of Biscay, as it has been talked before the king to make a marriage between John of Eltham, the king's brother, and the daughter 1 of his late son 2 , the king agrees to this marriage if her and the king of Spain 3 , his cousin agrees too. The king requests her 4 to consent to this marriage and certify the king she wants to continue this negotiation.
- 1.
- María Díaz II de Haro
- 2.
- Juan el Tuerto
- 3.
- Understand here 'king of Castile', that is Alfonso XI.
- 4.
- María Díaz I de Haro.
- 47
-
28 March. Lincoln Nicole.
Letter to Alfonso [XI], king of Castile Castelle, kinsman of the king, requesting his consent to the marriage between his brother John of Eltham and the daughter 1 of the lord Juan [el Tuerto], former lord of Biscay Biskae arguing that it will renew the friendship and love between their subjects. On this matter, the king requests Alfonso XI to write to María [Díaz I de Haro], lady of Biscay in order she gives her consent.
- 48
-
13 February. Lincoln. For Johan Guitard.
Order to the seneschal of Gascony to inform himself about the following facts and learn the names of the criminals by inquiry and other means: there is a quarrel where is involved Johan Guitard Guytardy, clerk and Guytardy controller of the castle of Bordeaux Burdeg'. Guitard with his family and all his goods were and still are under the king's safeguard by the king's letters patent and Guitard with the prévôt of Bordeaux went to a house of Bordeaux, where some criminals brought some Guitard's goods, in order to seize these goods in the king's hand according to the Bordeaux' customs. But Guilhem d'Aiguille Agulha, damoiseau, brother of the Agulha lord of Montferrand Mons Ferrandi 1 hidding in this house attacked him with his sword, and after that he returned with the lord of Montferrand, Thomas de Montferrand Mons Ferrandi, Pey de Courbin Corbino, de and about twenty men with swords drawn as well with other weapons invading Guitard's house in crying "Kill! Kill!" (ad mortem, ad mortem) and intended to kill Guitard and all the family who was with him, and they wounded and almost killed one member of his family, leaving him almost dead in a public street. They still want to kill Guitard and his family and that stops Guitard to exercise his office to his great damage and to the breach and contempt of the king's safeguard. The seneschal has to punish all the persons he find guilty in order to scare those who want to act against the king, his servants or the persons who are under the king's safeguard. 2
By K.
- 1.
- We do not know if this Guilhem d'Aiguille was a brother of the lord of Montferrand Amaubin III de Barès through his father or his mother, but there is a Reynaut de Montferrand, lord of Aiguille who gave homage in 1363 to the Black Prince as prince of Aquitaine. Then it could have been the son of this Guilhem "d'Aiguille" who would be in this case a brother sharing the same father as Amaubin III de Barès, lord of Montferrand.
- 2.
- See the related entry entry 94.
- 49
-
3 May. Northampton. For Arnaut Micol.
Order to the seneschal of Gascony to stop any prosecutions or grievances against Arnaut Micol, king's merchant, who previously bought 22 tuns of wine in Kingston upon Hull Kingeston super Hull belonging to Pey Eyquem Iqem of Bordeaux for the late Thomas, earl of Lancaster Lancastr', the remainder to be paid on delivery of the wine. But, Micol joined Lancaster at Pontefract Pons Fractus and followed him in York Eboracum when he was in jail; in the meantime the wines were delivered [in England] and seized in the king's hand as certified by the bills of the bailiffs and the whole community of [Kingston upon Hull]. Subsequently, Pey Eyquem who asked Micol 42l. 10s. tried to harm him on the mainland (partes transmarine) and on sea.
- 50
-
8 May. Northampton. For Johan de Brocas.
Order to the seneschal of Gascony to give the scribanias and its issues mentioned down there to Johan Brocas in this form: as the king granted for life to Johan Brocas, king's valet Brocaz, because of his good service to Edward II and the current king, the scribanias of Penne[-d'Agenais] Penna and Puymirol in Agenais Agenesium perceiving from this office what others used to receive in this office as it is specified in the king's letters patent made to Brocas.
By p.s.
- 51
-
Same as above. For Guilhem de Bordeaux.
2Order to the seneschal of Gascony and the constable of Bordeaux to check the letters patent of Edward II by which, as asserts Guilhem de Bordeaux, king's valet Burdegala 1 in a petition to the king, was granted for life by [Edward II] the land of Durfort Dureford situated near Penne-d'Agenais Penna in Agennensis, and to permit Bordeaux to held this land according to the king's letters without any disturbance.
By p.s.
- 1.
- From the Bordeaux' ('Bordèu' in Gascon) family originating from Morlaàs. Guilhem de Bordeaux was the brother of Lop-Bergunh de Bordeaux and Oliber de Bordeaux.
- 2.
- C 81/153/1788 is the petition of Guilhem de Bordeaux being at the origin of this act which follows it almost word by word. The Chancery warrant of the king (C 81/153/1787) is dated 5 May 1328, so the mention "Datum ut supra" of this entry is probably wrong and this entry must be dated 5 May and not 8 May.
- 52
-
Same as above. For Lop-Bergunh [de Bordeaux].
3Order to the constable of Bordeaux to check the letters and receipts exhibited by Lop-Bergunh de Bordeaux Burdegala and to pay him what is owed to him as he 1 petitioned the king to be paid of several amounts of money: 620l. 4s.t. for his wages and other reasons during the last war of Gascony 2 ; 478l. 7s. 7d.t. he expended for María [Díaz II de Haro], damsel of Biscay domicelle, Biscaye on order of the former seneschal of Gascony Oliver de Ingham; 100l.t. for the 'restor' of his horses lost in the king's service in Gascony, and 100l.t. to enclose the town of Hastingues Hastingges on order of Richard de Grey, former seneschal of Gascony for Edward II.
By p.s.
- 1.
- From the Bordeaux' ('Bordèu' in Gascon) family originating from Morlaàs. Lop-Bergunh de Bordeaux was brother of Oliber de Bordeaux and Guilhem de Bordeaux.
- 2.
- The war of St-Sardos, 1324-5.
- 3.
- C 81/153/1789 has the petition (second petition on this document) of Lop-Bergunh de Bordeaux being at the origin of this act which follows it almost word by word. The Chancery warrant of the king (C 81/153/1787) is dated 5 May 1328, so the mention "Datum ut supra" of this entry is probably wrong and this entry must be dated 5 May and not 8 May.
- 53
-
Same as above. For the same. 1
2Order to the seneschal of Gascony and the constable of Bordeaux to check several patent letters of [Edward II] exhibited by Lop-Bergunh de Bordeaux who petitioned the king that, as Edward II granted him for life, because of his good service in the duchy: the place called Labenne La Bene; the keepership of the castle of Bayonne Baiona, with the customary wages and the prévôté of Bayonne, rendering per year 100l.st. or 500l.ch.. And after due checking, to deliver him this place and prévôté.
By p.s.
- 1.
- It is written Extractus in the margin.
- 2.
- C 81/153/1789 has the petition (first petition on this document) of Lop-Bergunh de Bordeaux being at the origin of this act which follows it almost word by word. The Chancery warrant of the king (C 81/153/1787) is dated 5 May 1328, so the mention "Datum ut supra" of this entry is probably wrong and this entry must be dated 5 May and not 8 May.
- 54
-
Same as above. For Johan de Brocas. 1
Grant for life to Johan de Brocas Brocaz of the scribanias of Penne[-d'Agenais] Penna and Puymirol perceiving in this office what others customary used to perceive in this office.
By p.s.
- 1.
- There is noted Extractus in the margin.
- 55
-
1328, 20 May. Northampton. For Arnaut de Claverie and others.
Order to the constable of Bordeaux to account with Arnaut de Claverie Clavery and his brothers Ramon[-Arnaut de Claverie], Guilhem[-Ramon de Claverie] who petitioned the king to be repaid of whar is owed of their wages as well for the 'restor' of their horses lost in the service of Edward II during the Gascon war 1 The constable will have due allowance in his account. 2
By petition of C.
- 1.
- The St-Sardos war, 1324-5.
- 2.
- The petition SC 8/39/1932 of Arnaut de Claverie names his brothers as Ramon-Arnaut de Claverie and Guilhem-Ramon de Claverie and these forenames are confirmed in C 61/41. This petition is partly at the origin of this act as Arnaut requested the 'restor' of their horses lost during their service in Puymirol and Bazas, as appears by a warrant of Oliver de Ingham, then seneschal of Gascony and John Travers, constable of Bordeaux.
-
Similar letters about:
- 55.1
-
Same as above.
Arnaut de Labérine la Beryne 1 ; Ponts de Hautesvignes Altis Vineis, de; Guilhem-Ramon de Seyches Seches and Anessans de Caumont Cavus Mons, Cavus Mons lord of Saint-Barthélemy Sanctus Bartholomeus 2 ; Arnaut de Montpezat Mons Pesatus 4 ; Galhart de Borce Borse 5 ; Bertran [de Montlau], son of the lord of Montlau Mountclawe 6 ; Guilhem-Ramon de Seyches, de Seyches lord of Seyches Seches 7 ; Guiscart de Caumont Cavo Monte 8 ; Galhart de Landiras 10 ; Ayquem-Guilhem de Lamothe la Mote 11 ; Guilhem de Caumont Cavo Monte 12 and Anessans [de Caumont], lord of Tombeboeuf Tonneby 13 ; Arnaut de Durfort Duro Forti, de for him and his companions. 14
- 1.
- SC 8/293/14605 is the petition of Arnaut de Labérine which is at the origin of this entry. He requests there to have paid the 'restor' of his horses, proved by a warrant of Oliver de Ingham, and his wages by the constable of Bordeaux.
- 2.
- There are two petitions which are at the origin of this act: in SC 8/287/14337, Guilhem-Ramon, lord of Seyches and Anessants de Caumont, lord of Saint-Barthélemy petitioned the king to have paid their wages as proven by warrants of constables of Bordeaux and of Oliver d'Ingham. They requests as well to compensate the damages they endured in the king's service. In SC 8/282/14062, they petitioned with Guiscart de Caumont to ask that their wages owed from the war of Gascony 3 been paid by the constable of Bordeaux.
- 3.
- The war of St-Sardos, 1324-5.
- 4.
- Arnaut de Montpezat, co-lord of Aiguillon, see SC 8/282/14090. The petition SC 8/285/14206 where he requests to have his wages and the 'restor' of his horses paid by the constable of Bordeaux is probably at the origin of this entry.
- 5.
- His name is crossed.
- 6.
- SC 8/293/14632 is the petition of Bertran, son of the lord of Montlau, where he requests the king to order the constable of Bordeaux to pay him his wages and the 'restor' of his horses lost in the king's service.
- 7.
- It is a repetition, see the note on his petitions with Anessants de Caumont, lord of St-Barthélemy.
- 8.
- In SC 8/282/14062, Guiscart de Caumont petitioned with Guilhem-Ramon, lord of Seyches and Anessants de Caumont, lord of St-Barthélemy to ask that their wages owed from the war of Gascony 9 been paid by the constable of Bordeaux.
- 9.
- The war of St-Sardos, 1324-5.
- 10.
- This is Galhart de St-Symphorien, lord of Landiras. SC 8/287/14317 is his petition at the origin of this entry. He requested the payment by the constable of Bordeaux of his wages and the 'restor' of his horses.
- 11.
- Son of Pey de Lamothe, lord of Bisqueytan as written in C 61/41, m.4. SC 8/49/2445 is his petition at the origin of this entry. He requested there the payment by the constable of Bordeaux of his wages and the 'restor' of his horses lost on the last war. In the original, it is written Alkennus Guilliam which is probably an Ayquem-Guilhem
- 12.
- This is Guilhem II de Caumont, lord of Caumont.
- 13.
- SC 8/285/14201 is the common petition of Guilhem de Caumont and Anessans de Caumont where they requested their wages and the restor of their horses they lost since the beginning of the war [of St-Sardos].
- 14.
- SC 8/43/2146 is the petition where Arnaut de Durfort resquests for him and his men their wages and the 'restor' of their horses lost during the war. Petition published in Peña (1977), no.506, p 319-320
- 56
-
Same as above. For Guilhem-Arnaut [III d'Auros], lord of Auros.
Order to the constable of Bordeaux to account with Guilhem-Arnaut [III d'Auros], lord of Auros who petitioned the king and his council about his wages owed to him for the late war of Gascony 1 to pay these sums. The constable will have due allowance in his account.
By petition of C.
- 1.
- The war of St-Sardos, 1324-5.
-
In the same way it is written about:
- 56.1
-
Same as above.
Fauquet de Monpuy 1 ; Guilhem [de Caumont], lord of Caumont Cavus Mons; 2 ; Pey Caillau Calculi 3 ; Ramon Pelet 4 ; Pey de Gabarret Gavaretto, de 5 ;
- 1.
- His petition is maybe TNA, SC 8/285/14246, after the one of Doat-Amaniu [de Bouglon]. He requested the payment of his wages as he was able to show a warrant of Oliver de Ingham, then seneschal of Gascony.
- 2.
- It is a repetition. His petition SC 8/285/14 201 with Anessants de Caumont, lord of Tombeboeuf is at the origin of this entry.
- 3.
- Pey Caillau, burgess of Bordeaux. SC 8/285/14 202 A is at the origin of this entry. He requested there his wages from the last war of Gascony.
- 4.
- Co-lord of the Puy-de-Gontaud (now Gontaud-de-Nogaret). SC 8/282/14 056 where Pelet requests his wages is maybe the petition at the origin of this petition.
- 5.
- Pey de Gabarret was co-lord of Langon, but complained in SC 8/287/14 330 (reply in C 61/40, m.6, 20 May 1328) that this town was still held by the king of France. SC 8/287/14331 is probably at the origin of this entry. He requested his wages (810 l.t.) from the time Oliver de Ingham was seneschal of Gascony.
- 56.2
-
Same as above.
Galhart de Borce Borse 1 ; Doat Amanieu Amanevi 2 ; Arnaut de Labérine la Beryne 3 ; Ramon Durand Durandi 4 ; William Chamberlein Chamberleyn 5
- 1.
- SC 8/292/14596 is the petition at the origin of this entry. Bourg requests his wages for him and thirty Spanish with whom he has been at the king's service during the last war of Gascony. These wages amount to the sum of 28l. 15s.t. as he was able to prove it with three receipts of John Travers, then constable of Bordeaux.
- 2.
- His petition is the first written on SC 8/285/14246 (the second and last one being the one of Fauquet de Monpuy). He requested there his wages as it was shown in the receipts of Oliver de Ingham, then seneschal of Gascony.
- 3.
- It is a repetition. See his petition SC 8/293/14605.
- 4.
- Maybe SC 8/287/14324 is at the origin of this entry.
- 5.
- Maybe SC 8/39/1907 is at the origin of this entry.
- 56.3
-
Same as above.
Arnaut-Guilhem de Castillon Castillyon and his brother Bernat [de Castillon] 1
- 1.
- SC 8/287/14345 is at this origin of this act. There Arnaut-Guilhem de Castillon and his brother Bernat requests the king that the constable of Bordeaux pay the horses they lost in the king's service.
- 57
-
Same as above. For Bernat de Domecq-Libarrenx 1 .
3Order to the seneschal of Gascony and the constable of Bordeaux to deliver to Bernat de Domecq-Libarrenx Lybaren' Dudoinek 2 the requested office under the king's seal in use in the duchy. Bernat de Domecq-Libarrenx petitioned the king that in compensation of his damages he suffered because of the wars in the duchy he had for life the office of messenger of Haute-Soule Sole Soubiran and of the castellany of Mauléon Malus Leo that the king granted him for life. The seneschal and constable to certify him of the value of this office under the king's seal in use in the duchy.
By petition of C.
- 1.
- It is written Extractus in the margin.
- 2.
- The parish of Libarrenx has been merged with the neighbouring parish of Gotein and is now in the commune of Gotein-Libarrenx. There were there several noble houses in Libarrenx with among them the noble house of Domecq. Its lord was called the 'lord of Domecq-Libarrenx'.
- 3.
- SC 8/287/14332 is the petitition of Bernat de Domecq-Libarrenx at the origin of this act as its content is faithfully followed in this entry. In this petition he mentioned he had been in the retinue of Guilhem-Ramon de Caumont (future lord of Caumont, son of Guilhem II, lord of Caumont) and he requested for life the office named 'messager second' according to the language of the land of the land of Soule and of the castellany of Mauléon, as because of the war he had received great damage of 'body and goods', so that he had nothing to live. On the dorse of this petition, there is the reply where is mentioned the fact that Guilhem-Ramon de Caumont had seen it, ordering to the seneschal of Gascony and the constable of Bordeaux to deliver this office to him to be hold at will, and to certify the king of its value.
- 58
-
Same as above. For Johannes de Balloe.
1Order to the seneschal of Gascony, as Johannes de Balloe petitioned the king before him and his council that because of his good service Edward II granted him at pleasure the office of general serjeant in the duchy and he requested the king to confirm him in this office, to grant again at pleasure this office under the king's seal in use in the duchy, if this latter is suitable and if the sergeanties are not overburdened.
By petition of C.
- 1.
- SC 8/31/1533 is the petition of Johan de Balloe at the origin of this entry. He requested there to have his office of serjeant confirmed by the king for life or at will. On the dorse of the petition it is written that the seneschal will give him a brief if there are not too many serjeants.
- 59
-
Same as above. For Doat Amanieu.
1Order to the seneschal of Gascony, as Guilhem-Ramon de Caumont Cavus Mons petitioned the king before him and his council to grant for life to Doat Amanieu, his companion, in compensation of the damages he suffered during the war in the duchy, an annuity (census) of 12l.st. on the issues of the baylie of Castel-Amouroux Castrum Amorosii in Agenais Agen'.
By petition of C.
- 1.
- SC 8/286/14 288 is the petition of Guilhem-Ramon de Caumont on behalf of his companion Doat Amanieu which is at the origin of this entry. In there, Caumont asserts that the king owed to Amanieu the land of [Auda], lady of Tiran, but the king does not want to give it to him, so he requests the king to give him for life 12l.st. on the baylie of Castel-Amouroux, which baylie was then in the French's hands. Reply on the dorse: agreement of the king's council if the king agrees. Another script: the king agrees. This petition is reported in Rotuli Parliamentorum Anglie Hactenus Inediti, ed. H.G. Richardson and G. Sayles, London, 1935, p.183, Parliament of Northampton, Easter 1328.
- 60
-
1328, 28 March. Lincoln.
Letter to John de Haustede, seneschal of Gascony and John de Weston, constable of Bordeaux where the king informs them he well received their letters sent to him and brought by Master Bertran de Coudène Codene and heard what he was in charge to say. The king is determined to recover his rights and inheritances and he put them in charge to speak and deal with all the nobles, communes and others who are outside the king's obedience to attract their hearts and their will towards the king in order they help the king when it will be the time to recover his rights and inheritance. 1 They have to promise to them on behalf of the king favours, gifts, pardons and other benefits according to what they will see necessary to promise. The king has requested by his other letters Bérart [I] d'Albret la Bret and Arnaut de Montpezat Mountpesat to do the same thing towards the nobles and their friends in these regions. On that, the king has fully say his will to Bertran de Coudène who can be trusted, and the king wants that the seneschal and constable have to often informed on this business and others the said Albret, Montpezat and Coudène. And from time to time, they have to sent news to the king together with their advices in order the king can always stays on one's guard. The king sees in a favourable light the expenses and troubles the seneschal and constable do in his service and will act towards them in order they will be happy. On the articles on the state of the duchy and other things on the next Parliament which will take place at Northampton Norhampton' three weeks after next Easter the king will order to the best. About the girl of Biscay 2 who is in their custody, the king has ordered what to do and put them in charge to keep her well in order it is the king's and hers honor.
- 1.
- It refers to the claim of Edward III to the thrones of France and Navarre as King Charles IV recently died without male heirs on 1 February 1328 and it is very unlikely it could refer to Edward III's rights to the parts of the duchy of Aquitaine still occupied by the French since the war of St-Sardos (1324-5).
- 2.
- María Díaz II de Haro
- 61
-
Same as above.
Letter to Bérart [I] d'Albret Labret 1 where the king informs him he received some letters of the seneschal of Gascony and the constable of Bordeaux through Bertran de Coudène Master Codene, and at their delivery the king heard of Albret's good inclination towards the king and wants he continues on this way. The king informs him that he is decided to recover his rights and inheritance, so he requests Albret to speak and deal swiftly and with all the possible secrecy with all the nobles, communes and others who are outside the king's obedience to attract their hearts and their will towards the king in order they help the king when it will be the time to recover his rights and inheritance. They have to promise to them on behalf of the king favours, gifts, pardons and other benefits according to what they will see necessary to promise. On that, the king has fully say his will to Bertran de Coudène who can be trusted, and the king wants Albret to communicate on this matter or other with the seneschal, the constable, Arnaut de Montpezat Mountpesat and Coudène as often he will feel it necessary. And from time to time, he has to sent news to the king together with his advices in order the king can always stays on one's guard.
- 1.
- The text write 'Bernard de la Brete', but it is an error for 'Berard de la Brete'.
- 61.1
-
Same as above.
The same letter adapted to his case is sent to Arnaut de Montpezat Montpesat.
- 62
-
Same as above.
Letter to Ramon Durand Durant. The king has well understood the content of the letters Durand sent to him through Pieres his valet, porter of this king's letter to Durand, and thank him for his good advice. The king informs him that he is decided to recover his rights and inheritance, so he requests Bérart [I] d'Albret to speak and deal swiftly and with all the possible secrecy with the lord of Gramont Grant Mont 1 and all the other nobles and magnates of the kingdom of Navarre Navarr' in order they help his mother 2 and him when it will be the time to recover their rights and inheritance. He has to promise to them on behalf of the king favours, gifts, pardons and other benefits according to what they will see necessary to promise. The king has written in other letters to all the persons he sent the name through his valet 3 in the way Durand adviced in his letters to the king which the transcription is enclosed with these letters 4 and the king wants he delivers them when he will consider it is the right moment. The king has especialy written to the constable of Bordeaux to pay him the arrears of his wages and the 'restor' of his horses. And about the great expenses, troubles and torments he suffered in his service, the king will act towards him in order he will be happy. About the other things contained in these letters the king will order to the best on the next Parliament which will take place at Northampton Norhampton' three weeks after next Easter. According to Durand's advice, the king wrote to the king of Spain Despaigne 5 about the marriage of the girl of Biscay 6 and also, by advice of his council, the king wrote to the lady of Biscay 7 on the same business.
- 1.
- Arnaut-Guilhem IV de Gramont.
- 2.
- Isabella of France
- 3.
- Pieres
- 4.
- See entries no.65 and 65.1.
- 5.
- Understand here the king of Castile.
- 6.
- María Díaz II de Haro
- 7.
- María Díaz I de Haro
- 63
-
Same as above.
Letter to Bertran de Coudène Codene. The king informs him that he is decided to recover his rights and inheritance, so he requests him to speak and deal swiftly and with all the possible secrecy with all the nobles, communes and others who are his friend in these regions which are outside the king's obedience to attract their hearts and their will towards the king in order they help the king when it will be the time to recover his rights and inheritance. He has to promise to them on behalf of the king favours, gifts, pardons and other benefits according to what he will see necessary to promise. The king wants Coudène to communicate on this matter or other with the seneschal, the constable, Bérart [I] d'Albret la Brette, Arnaut de Montpezat Mountpesat as often he will feel it necessary. And from time to time, he has to sent news to the king together with his advices in order the king can always stays on one's guard.
- 64
-
Same as above.
Letter to Ramfré [de Montpezat], lord of Montpezat Mont Pesat. The king has learned the good inclination that his father Ramon-Bernat [de Montpezat], lord of Montpezat towards Edward II and the great damages that Ramfré and his father suffered and still suffer because of the loss and destruction of his castle [of Montpezat] and of his other goods because of his loyalty to the king. The king will have a special concern to restore him his castle and compensate his other losses that him and his father have suffered for him that Ramfré and his friends will be happy.
- 65
-
Same as above.
Letter to Arnaut-Guilhem [IV de Gramont], lord of Gramont Eygremound. The king learned the good inclination he had towards his mother 1 and him and towards his ancestors and pray him to continue this behaviour about all things concerning or which will concern the king in these regions, and to give such help and advice that the king will feel his good inclination to him and his mother, so that he will be grateful towards him. On that matter, the king explained more fully his intention to Ramon Durand Durant.
-
In the same way it is written to:
- 65.1
-
Same as above.
In the same manner is sent to 1 : the main barons, bishops, abbots, priors and communes of the kingdom of Navarre Navarra, that are: the bishop of Pamplona Pampalona 2 ; the prior of Roncesvalles Ronssasvals; the abbot of Irache Dyrach; the abbot of San Salvador [de Leyre] Seint Saubador 3 ; Juan Corbarán[de Lehet] Corbaran 4 ; Arnaut-Guilhem [IV de Gramont], lord of Gramont; Juan Martínez de Medrano[called 'the Elder'] Moderano; Simón de Aibar Yvar 5 ; Ramiro Pérez de Arroniz Roindz; Pedro Sánchez de Montagut; Don Pedro Sánchez de Mirafuentes Mirafoyntas 6 ; the good people and community of Pamplona Pampalona; the good people and community of Tudela; the good people and commune of Estella Estela; the good people and commune of Sangüesa Senguossa; the prior of Navarre of the order of Saint John of Jerusalem 7 ; all the lords and nobles of the kingdom of Navarre; all the infanzons 8 of the kingdom of Navarre 9
- 1.
- As specified in the letter to Ramon Durand (entry no.62), this list has been sent to the king by Durand himself.
- 2.
- The Gascon Arnaut-Guilhem de Barbazan was then bishop of Pamplona.
- 3.
- The abbot of Leyre was then the Gascon Guilhem de Montpezat.
- 4.
- Juan Corbarán de Lehet or Leet, alferez of Navarre (The alferez was the head of the army) and Juan Martínez de Medrano 'the Elder', judge of the Cort of Navarre, lord of Sartaguda, had been appointed regents of the kingdom of Navarre in 1328 in waiting the arrival there of their queen Jeanne II de France and her husband Philippe d'Evreux. These latter were crowned at Pamplona queen and king of Navarre on 5 March 1329.
- 5.
- He was a clerk,royal proctor and the treasurer of Navarre.
- 6.
- It is an error of the English scribes. This person was Pedro Jiménez de Mirafuentes and not a Pedro Sánchez de Mirafuentes. He was the main judge of the Court of Navarre.
- 7.
- Artal de Echávano.
- 8.
- nobles of the gentry
- 9.
- On all this see documents published in Archivo General de Navarra (1322-1349). I. Documentacion Real, ed. D. Barragán Domeño, Fuentes documentales medievales del País Vasco (San Sebastián, 1997), particularly doc. no.43, p.64-66 and 44, p.66-70.
- 65.2
-
Same as above.
The names of those of Toulousain Tolsa and Languedoc Lengua d'oc to whom is sent this letter: the count of Foix Foyhs; the count of Comminges Cumenge; the count of Astarac Destarac; the marshal of Mirepoix Mirapoyhs; Lord Gui de Comminges Cumenge; Lord Roger de Comminges Cumenge; the lord of Narbonne Niarbona 1 ; the lord of Auterive Dauta Riva; the vicomte of Monlezun Monlusu 2 ; the vicomte of Bruniquel Brunequel; the vicomte of Lautrec Lautriec; the lord of l'Isle[-Jourdain] la Ylha; the lord of Capendu Campendut; the lord of Launac Lunnac; the lord of Fontenilles Fontanilhas; the lord of Aspet Daspa; the lord of Lanta Lantar; Lord Ramon-Bernat [de] Durfort called Dosina Durfort; the lord of Montesquiou Montesquiu; the vicomte of Caraman Caramanh; the lord of Montaut;
- 1.
- It was the vicomte of Narbonne and not only the "lord" of Narbonne.
- 2.
- It is in fact the count of Pardiac who was often named as count of 'Monlezun', Monlezun being his most important castle.
- 65.3
-
Same as above.
the lord of Seint Lop; the lord of Noé Noyer; the lord of Daudofila; the lord of Villeneuve-la-Comptal Vilanova la Comptal; the lord of Savignac Savoynac in Rouergue Roseigne 1 ; the lord of Arpajon Darpaio 2 ; the lord of la Romiguière la Romeguiera ; the lord of Lonor'.
- 1.
- The historical region of Rouergue corresponds in the whole to the département of Aveyron.
- 2.
- The lords of 'Arpajon' were in fact one of the most important lords of Rouergue, a historical region corresponding to the current département of Aveyron.
- 65.5
-
Same as above.
Montauban Montalba; Moissac Moysshac; Castelsarrasin Castet Sarazi; Lauzerte Lausserta; Mont-de-Domme Mon de Doma; Périgueux Peyraguers; Bergerac Viageyrac; Pons; Millau Amelhau.
- 66
-
1328, 20 May. Northampton. For Guilhem-Amaniu [de Madaillan].
2Order to the king's lieutenant in Gascony and to seneschal of Gascony to have deliberation with the members of the king's council in the duchy he find suitable to call on that matter: Guilhem-Amaniu [de Madaillan], lord of Rauzan Rosano petitioned the king before him and his council he has suffered many damages because of his service to the king during the last wars in the duchy, so he requested the king to be paid of the sum of 2000l.t. owed to him as he asserts, to confirm the grants given to him by Edmund [of Woodstock], earl of Kent, uncle of the current king and then king's lieutenant of the duchy for Edward II, to return to him the possessions granted by Kent to his brother Ponts [de Madaillan] who had been killed during the same war 1 and to pay him the wages owed to Ponts for the duration of his service to the king during this war as Guilhem-Amaniu is his brother and executor. The lieutenant and seneschal has to decide on these matters according to the law.
By petition of C.
- 1.
- The war of St-Sardos, 1324-5.
- 2.
- SC 8/310/15461 is the petition of the lord of Rauzan being at the origin of this entry. The order of the requests of this petition follows exactly the order in this entry. This petition informs us that John of Brittany granted to the lord of Rauzan an office in Gascony. He asked to have the sum of 2000l.parv.t. be paid to him or his substitute. On the dorse the reply is that the king will send a lieutenant or a seneschal in Gascony with full power to decide on this matter.
- 67
-
Same as above. For Galhart [d'] Assalit.
3Order to the seneschal of Gascony and the constable of Bordeaux to grant to Galhart d'Assalit Assailhit the baylie of Born and Labouheyre Herba Favera for a suitable farm as this latter petitioned the king before him and his council that Edward II granted him because of his good service the keepership of the castle of Blaye Blavia in Bordelais Burdegales', and the bailiwick of the Wapentake 1 of Bassetlaw Bersetlowe in having, he asserted, the keepership a value of 40m. and the bailiwick 13m., and the aforesaif Assalit has been removed of both offices, to entrust [in compensation] him at will with the baylie of Born 2 and Labouheyre with their appurtenances, rendering an annual appropriate quitrent.
By petition of C.
- 1.
- Most southern counties in England, and some in the north-west such as Cheshire and Lancashire were divided into administrative districts called hundreds (Kent and Sussex are notable exceptions). These were the counties that remained under Anglo-Saxon control or were early recovered during the time of the Scandinavian invasions. In the counties heavily settled by the Scandinavians known as the Danelaw, the counties were divided into districts called Wapentakes which came to function in similar ways as hundreds. Counties in the Danelaw are Yorkshire, Nottinghamshire and Derbyshire.
- 2.
- The land of Born was a region situated at the south of the Bordelais or diocese of Bordeaux, now on the north-west corner of the département of the Landes.
- 3.
- SC 8/290/14473 is a petition of Galhart d'Assalit related to this entry. There he stated that Edward II granted him the keepership of the castle of Blaye worthing 193l.parv.t per year. But he was removed from this office which was given to someone else. Because of this office, it is owed to them from the time Adam de Limber was constable of Bordeaux the sum of 350l. 10s.parv.t. and Edward II ordered Limber to pay him this sum. And from the time John Travers was constable of Bordeaux, the king owed him 51l. 10s.parv.t.. Up to now, none of these sums have been paid to him, so he praid the king to pay or allocate on somewher these sums. Furthermore Edward II granted him the hundred of Bassetlaw in the Nottinghamshire, earning per year 22l.st., but he has been removed from this office since the coronation of Edward III, so he requested this latter to give him a grant in order to maintain his status and serve the king.
- 68
-
Same as above. For Huc de Savignac (...).
Order to the seneschal of Gascony, as Huc de Savignac Seviniaco petitioned the king before him and his council that in compensation of his losses during the damages he suffered during the last war in the duchy, as the castle of Marmande went outside the king's hand 1 and Savignac requested to receive the keepership of the castle of Marmande for life, perceiving the customary wages for this office, to entrust Savignac of this office under the king's seal in use in the duchy. 2
By petition of C.
- 1.
- It was then in French control.
- 2.
- SC 8/38/1883 is the petition of Savignac being at the origin of this entry. There he specified that his damages were caused by the fact he kept the castle of Marmande against the king of France during the last war. This petition is reported in Rotuli Parliamentorum Hactenus Inediti, p.185, Parliament of Northampton, Easter 1328.
- 69
-
Same as above. For Bertran [de] Coudène.
1Order ot the constable of Bordeaux to account with Bertran de Coudène of these wages: Bertran de Coudène Coden, clerk, petitioned the king before him and his council that the king owed him several wages from the time he was in the service of Edward II and the current king in the regions of France Franc', Toulouse Tollese and others, as well as his fee when he was councillor of Edward II in the seneschalcy of Agenais Agen' and juge-mage of Agenais. The constable has to pay to Coudène as far as he can of what will be found in this account. The constable will have due allowance in his account.
By petition of C.
- 1.
- The second part of Coudène's SC 8/286/14284 petition is at the origin of this entry.
- 70
-
Same as above. For Guilhem de Devès.
Announcement that, at the request of Master Johan Guitard Guytard, Guytard controller of the castle of Bordeaux Burdeg', the king granted at will the office of general serjeant in the duchy to Guilhem de Devès Deves which hold previously at will this office from the grant of Edward II, with the garments and profits customary partaining to this office, as the other general serjeants customary wear king's garments and profits of this office.
By petition of C.
- 71
-
Same as above.
Order to the seneschal of Gascony, the constable of Bordeaux and the prévôt of the king's [castle] of the Ombrière of Bordeaux Burdeg' to allow Guilhem de Devès to be a king's serjeant wearing king's garments in the duchy and deliver to him these garments and other profits partaining to this office.
By petition of C.
- 72
-
Same as above. For Espan de Lare.
Order to the seneschal of Gascony, as Espan de Lare 1 petitioned the king before him and his council to grant him, because he suffered many damages during the last war in the duchy, the office of messenger of the land of la Barhoue la Birho and of the castellany of Mauléon Malo Leone in order to maintain his status, to know if Lare is suitable for this office, and if the sergeanties are not overburdened, they can grant at will this office to Lare under the king's seal in use in the duchy.
By petition of C.
- 1.
- There is a local placename named Lare in commune of Jurançon, arrondissement of Pau, dép. Pyrénées-Atlantiques.
- 72.1
-
Same as above.
1Same letters for Gui-Arnaut de Saint-Étienne Sancto Stephano to be messenger of the land and castellany of Mauléon Malo Lione.
By petition of C.
- 1.
- SC 8/285/14231 is his petition at the origin of this entry. He called himself there Gui-Arnaut de 'Seint-Estefyn Juso'. He requested there the king to nominate him 'sworn serjeant' which was called 'second messenger in the language of the country' of the baylie and castellany of Mauléon.
- 73
-
Same as above. For Huguet Auger.
2Order to the constable of Bordeaux to account with Huguet Auger Oger the arrears of the 10s.t. per day owed to him, as this latter petitioned the king before him and his council in Parliament 1 that the king's lieutenant in the duchy granted him, in compensation of his lands lost during the last war in the duchy, to receive by the hand of the constable of Bordeaux, 10s.t. per day. But since the time of this grant, Auger did not achieve to be paid of this sum, so he complained to the king. Of what is found in arrears, the constable has to pay it as far as possible to Auger. The constable will have due allowance in his account.
By petition of C.
- 1.
- Parliament of Northampton, Easter 1328
- 2.
- SC 8/288/14 377 is maybe the petition being at the origin of this entry.
- 74
-
1328, 20 May. Northampton For Guiraut de Tastes.
2Announcement that because of his good service the king granted for life to Guiraut de Tastes his right of high justice (altam iusticiam) with all its rights in all Tastes' lands of the bastide of Sainte-Croix-du-Mont Sanctis Crucis de Monte 1 to be hold from the king and his heirs, saving the king's juridical superiority and that this high justice has to revert to the king and his heirs at the death of Tastes.
By p.s. and petition of C.
- 1.
- As far as we know Sainte-Croix-du-Mont was not a bastide, that is a new town.
- 2.
- The second part of C 81/155/1903 is the petition of Guiraut de Tastes requesting the grant of the king's high justice of Ste-Croix-du Mont for life because, he argued there, because it made no profits to the king and his ancestors. On the dorse the reply is that the king grants him this high justice for life and that he will be informed of its value by his officers in this region. The Chancery warrant ordering that is C 81/155/1902, dated 23 May 1328.
- 75
-
Same as above.
And it is ordered to the seneschal of Gascony and the constable of Bordeaux to have with the members of the king's council in the duchy a full information on the annual value of this high justice and on other things partaining to it. Information to be made under the king's seal in use in the duchy and to be sent without delay to the king.
By p.s. and petition of C.
- 76
-
Same as above.
And it is ordered to the seneschal of Gascony to deliver this high justice to Guiraut de Tastes under the conditions specified above.
By p.s. and petition of C.
- 77
-
Same as above. For Aubert Mège.
1Order to the constable of Bordeaux to account with Aubert Mège Master Medici, clerk, the wages owed to him, as this latter petitioned the king before him and his council that Edmund [of Woodstock], earl of Kent, uncle of the current king and then lieutenant of Edward II in the duchy and other people from the king's council of the duchy decided he will receive this wages by letters under the king's seal in use in the duchy. On what is found during the account, the constable has to pay it as far as possible to Mège. The constable will have due allowance in his account.
By petition of C.
- 1.
- SC 8/287/14328 is the petition at the origin of this entry.
- 78
-
Same as above. For Johan Vivent of the diocese of Bordeaux.
2Order to the seneschal of Gascony, as Johan Vivent of the diocese of Bordeaux Burdeg' petitioned the king before him and his council that in compensation for the damages he suffered at the occasion of the wars in the duchy the king grants him for life the scribania of the baylie of Marmande being now outside the king's hand 1 , when this baylie returns in the king's hand, to grant at will to Vivent if he behave well this scribania when it returns in the king's hand.
By petition of C.
- 1.
- Then in French control.
- 2.
- SC 8/288/14371 is the petition of Johan Vivent being at the origin of this entry. As he has lost 100l.st. or more during the wars of Gascony, he requested the king to grant him the scribania of Marmande when this town will be in the hand of the king and not anymore in the king of France's hand.
- 79
-
Same as above. For the jurats and inhabitants of the king's bastide of Hastingues.
1Order to the seneschal of Gascony to have full information on the defects of Hastingues Astynges enclosure for the security of the bastide and its inhabitants, as the jurats and inhabitants of this bastide of Hastingues Hastyng' petitioned the king before him and his council to save the said bastide against ennemy assaults and in help to enclose this bastide, to permit them to perceive the king's toll of the town during a certain period of time. The seneschal has to decice to remedy to the situation with this toll or another manner he will find suitable.
By petition of C.
- 1.
- The first part of the petition SC 8/290/14 482 of the jurats and inhabitants of Hastingues could be at the origin of this entry.
- 80
-
1328, 20 May. Northampton. For Aubert Mège.
1Order to the seneschal of Gascony, if John de Weston, constable of Bordeaux, neglects to obey the king's order on the following matter, to enforce what is just: Aubert Mège Master Medici, clerk, petitioned the king before him and his council that victuals and other things were delivered on the king's order to him by John de Weston, constable of Bordeaux and his men, and indentures and memoranda were made on this matter, and these victuals and other things remained in possession of Mège as he said, because the aforesaid Weston denied he made indentures and still unjustly denies it to the great damage of the aforesaid Weston on what this latter petitioned the king to provide a remedy, and the king ordered the aforesaid Weston to check the said indentures and memoranda.
By petition of C.
- 1.
- SC 8/159/7932 is the petition of Aubert Mège at the origin of this entry.
- 81
-
Same as above. For Pey de Gabarret.
2Order to the seneschal of Gascony and the constable of Bordeaux, as Pey de Gabarret Gawarette, former co-lord of Langon petitioned the king before him and his council that Edmund [of Woodstock], earl of Kent, uncle of the current king and then lieutenant of the duchy for Edward II former king of England and duke of Aquitaine, allocated to him in compensation of the lands, tenements and revenues the aforesaid Gabarret lost in Langon during the war of Gascony 1 seized by the king of France because he staid in the service of Kent, 1000l.t. per year on the land of Livran Liverant which value does not exceed 400l.t.; to inform themselves on the lands, tenements and revenues lost by the aforesaid Gabarret and on the value of the grant of Kent, and when this information is finished to send it to the king without delay under the king's seal in use in the duchy.
By petition of C.
- 1.
- The war of St-Sardos, 1324-5
- 2.
- SC 8/287/14330 is clearly the petition of Pey de Gabarret at the origin of this act.
- 82
-
1328, 22 May. Northampton. For Huguet Auger.
3Order to the seneschal of Gascony to have such consideration to the losses suffered by Huguet Auger Oger in his service to the king in such way he will be pleased with it. Huguet Auger petitioned the king before him and his council in Parliament 1 that because of the service of him and his father during the last war in the duchy 2 and the loss of his land which is still in French's hands, Oliver de Ingham, then seneschal of Gascony made an inquiry on the value of this land and after granted to the aforesaid Auger 10s.t. to be received by him per day from the constable of Bordeaux until something else was decided was ordered, but Auger received nothing so he petitioned the king that, in compensation of the 10s.t. per day he received the prévôté of Saint-Émilion Sancto Milione until he is repaid of what is owed to him from this quitrent of 10s.t. per day.
By petition of C.
- 1.
- Parliament of Norhampton, Easter 1328.
- 2.
- The war of Saint-Sardos, 1324-5.
- 3.
- SC 8/288/14377 is the petition of Huguet Auger at the origin of this entry. There he explains that him and his father served the king during the [last] war of Gascony and that he lost at this moment his land, which is in the hand of the French, and his father and one of his brother died during this service. There has been an inquiry on the loss of this land by Oliver de Ingham at the king's order. Thus, it had been ordered to grant him 10s.t. per day; a decision confirmed by the king. As he did not succeed to obtain this money, he requests the king to have the prévôté of St-Emilion.
- 83
-
20 May. Northampton. For Bertruc de Tilh, serjeant-at-arms.
1Order to the seneschal of Gascony and the constable of Bordeaux to allocate the following place for a annual suitable quitrent under the king's seal in use of the duchy in order to pay the sum owed to him in the king's wardrobe, as Bertruc de Tilh Tilio, serjeant-at-arms, petitioned the king before him and his council that he stayed in the service of Edward II and the current king for a long time and worked incessantly in this service during war time as well as peace time without any payment, so he requested the king to grant him for life the place of Bédorède Bedored' with its appurtenances in the seneschalcy of the Landes Landar' which value is, he asserts, 10l.st. per year, as the late Bernat Bordet Burdet hold this place by grant of Edward II rendering a suitable annual quitrent so that the 43l.st. owed to him as shown in bills of Edward II's wardrobe will be pay by this allocation.
By petition of C.
- 1.
- SC 8/75/3745 is maybe the petition of Bertruc de Tilh at the origin of this petition. Tilh specified there that he was in the king's service for eighteen years.
- 84
-
Same as above. For Guilhem-Ramon [de Caumont].
2Order to the seneschal of Gascony, as Guilhem-Ramon [de Caumont], serjeant-at-arms, 1 petitioned the king before him and his council to obtain the baylies of Seignanx Cieyns and Gosse Gounce in the same manner that Bernat de Pendase, in allocation of the sum of 22l. 12s.st. owed to him by Edward II as it is shown by bills of his wardrobe, to grant him at will these baylies for a suitable price annually paid under the king's seal in use in the duchy.
By petition of C.
- 1.
- Obviously, this Guilhem-Ramon de Caumont was a namesake and probably kinsman of the then current lord of Caumont, but not the lord of Caumont himself.
- 2.
- The petition SC 8/293/14602 of a certain 'Guilham de Koumond' (Guilhem de Caumont), serjeant-at-arms, is obviously at the origin of this entry as its content is exactly the same, and as the distortion of the names of the baylies are also the same ('Cieyns' and 'Gounce').
- 85
-
Same as above. For Robert de Lagrave, clerk, executor of the late Master Galhart Lacaze.
1Order to the seneschal of Gascony to make an information on that matter: Robert de Lagrave la Grave, clerk, executor of the late la Grave Master Galhart de Lacaze la Case petitioned the king because Edward II owed to the aforesaid Lacaze the sum of 200l. 6s.t. from the time this latter was in the service of this king in the regions of the duchy and others, sum bequeathed by Lacaze in his will. After the information is finished, the seneschal has to send it to the king under the king's seal in use in the duchy and the king will see what to do on that matter.
By petition of C.
- 1.
- The petition SC 8/287/14347 of Robert de Lagrave is at the origin of this entry. There he requested to be paid of the 200l. 6s.t. on the 'prévôté of Créon', in the petition 'perboustat de Craoun' (perbostat meant prévôté in Gascon language), that is in fact the prévôté of Entre-Deux-Mers.
- 86
-
1328, 28 May. Northampton. For the king's men of Tiran, of Bosc; in the parish of St-Médard-en-Jalles, of Ludée, etc.
1Order to the king's seneschals, constables, castellans, prévôts, bayles, ministers, king's liege men of the duchy and their lieutenants, as the king took in his safeguard for three years his men of Tiran Tyran, of Bosc Bosco in the parish of Saint-Médard-en-Jalles Sancti Medardi Angilesio, of Ludée Ludega, of Moulis[-en-Médoc] Mechoys, of Touleron Tholoron; Bernones Bernonas; Corbiac Corniac; Castelnau[-de-Médoc] Castro Novo, their men, their families, lands, things, revenues and all their possessions in the duchy, to maintain and protect their men, families, lands, things, revenues and all their legitimate possessions from unlawfull injuries and violence according to their competence. And if anything has been recently unlawfully attempted against them, they have to repeal it and correct it without delay.
By petition of C.
- 1.
- See Rotuli Parliamentorum Hactenus Inediti, p.185 (Parliament of Southampton, Easter 1328).
-
Similar king's letter have been made to:
- 86.1
-
Same as above.
1Ramon de Lamothe Mote, Mote burgess of Bordeaux Burdeg', and his brothers Guilhem de Lamothe and Robert de Lamothe from the parish of Bonnetan Bonetan at will.
- 1.
- SC 8/285/14207 is the petition of the three brothers which is at the origin of this entry. See also Rotuli Parliamentorum Anglie Hactenus Inediti, p.184.
- 86.2
-
Same as above.
Johan Guitard Master Guytard, controller of the duchy of Aquitaine, for three years.
- 86.3
-
Same as above.
The king's liege men and subjects of the parish Saint-Martin d'Eysines Sancti-Martini, Eydines and the parish Saint-Pierre de Bruges 1 situated next to Bordeaux, at will. 2
- 1.
- The church of Eysines (rebuilt at the end of the 19th century) is still named St-Martin and the church of Bruges (13th century) is also still named St-Pierre.
- 2.
- The petition SC 8/287/14334 is clearly at the origin of this act. There the king's 'liege men and subjects' of Saint-Martin d'Eysines and Saint-Pierre de Bruges requested the king's safeguard as they were malement mis by the men of the country. They asked the king to order the seneschal of Gascony to make them come to the castle of Bordeaux to accede to them on their business. See also Rotuli Parliamentorum Hactenus Inediti, p.185 (Parliament of Southampton, Easter 1328).
- 86.4
-
Same as above.
2Guiraut de Cambon Cambone, Cambone burgess of Bordeaux Burdeg' 1 , for three years.
By petition of C.
- 1.
- There is a Cambon-la-Pelouse, in com. Macau, arr. Bordeaux, dép. Gironde and a Cambon, in com. Le Fieu, arr. Libourne, dép. Gironde.
- 2.
- SC 8/294/14686 is the petition of Guiraut de Cambon at the origin of this act. There he requested the king as his tenant in fee in the town of Bordeaux and Blaye to have his safeguard as some people troubled him in the possession of his goods. See also Rotuli Parliamentorum Hactenus Inediti, p.185 (Parliament of Southampton, Easter 1328).
- 87
-
1328, 20 May. Northampton. For Arnaut Amanieu.
1Order to the seneschal of Gascony and the constable of Bordeaux; as Arnaut Amanieu Amanevi petitioned the king before him and his council that, in compensation of the losses of his lands, tenements, goods and chattels he suffered during the last war in the duchy, which amount to a great sum as he asserted, to grant him for life the lands and revenues who were possessions of Guilhem Lambert and his wife, who were king's ennemies, with their appurtenances in Bordeaux Burdeg' which were seized in the king's hand and worthed 15l.st. per year; to entrust to Amanieu the aforesaid lands and revenues with their appurtenances under the king's seal in use in the duchy, until the arrival of the king's lieutenant in the duchy and the [new] seneschal of Gascony or one of them decide for Amanieu's sake on this matter.
By petition of C.
- 1.
- The petition SC 8/31/1523 is maybe at the origin of this act. There Arnaut Amanieu said he was a companion of Oliver de Ingham and Guilhem-Ramon de Caumont. He lost the land of his wife worthing 20l.st. and 100l.st. of movables, because he staid faithful to the king in Agenais. So he requested the land and rents owned by Guilhem Lambert, king's rebel, that were worthing 15l.st..
- 88
-
20 May. Northampton. For Ramon Durand.
2Order to the seneschal of Gascony to grant at will the seneschalcy of the Landes Landar' in the duchy to Ramon Durand Durandi under the king's seal in use in the duchy. Ramon Durand had petitioned the king before him and his council that as Edward II granted him the seneschalcy of the Landes by his letters patent 1 , to confirm hims this office by his letters patent.
By petition of C.
- 1.
- On 25 March 1325.
- 2.
- SC 8/293/14626 is the petition of Ramon Durand at the origin of this entry. He requested there that, as Edward II granted him the seneschalcy of the Landes, to check the Chancery rolls in order to confirm the said grant.
- 89
-
Same as above. For John Bardolf called Rossignol.
2Order to the seneschal of Gascony and the constable of Bordeaux to grant at will under the king's seal in use in the duchy the paderie of Médoc pederiam, Medock 1 to John Bardolf called Rossignol Russynol as this latter petitioned to obtain this office worthing 100s.st. per year as he asserted, in compensation of the damages he suffered during the last war. The seneschal and the constable has to inform the king of the value of this office under the king's seal in use in the duchy.
By petition of C.
- 1.
- The paderie of Médoc was an office in charge of the pastures used by herds in the peninsula of Médoc coming from Pyrénées (Béarn and Basque Country) in transhumance for the Summer.
- 2.
- SC 8/167/8328 is the petition of John Bardolf at the origin of this entry. He requested there that the king grants him the paderie of Médoc in compensation of the losses he suffered in La Réole during the last war.
- 90
-
Same as above. For Guilhem-Amaniu [de Madaillan], lord of Rauzan.
1Order to the seneschal of Gascony, as Guilhem-Amaniu [de Madaillan], lord of Rauzan Rosan, petitioned the king before him and his council to nominate Guilhem de Lagarde la Garde at the office of general serjeant of the duchy, to inform himself if Lagarde is suitable for this office, and if the sergeanties are not overburdened, he can grant at will this office to Lagarde under the king's seal in use in the duchy.
By petition of C.
- 1.
- SC 8/69/3410 is the petition of the subsitute of the lord of Rauzan at the origin of this entry. There he petitioned the king to grant the general serjeanty to Guilhem de Lagarde as this latter remained to the king's service with the lord of Rauzan and his brother Ponts de Madaillan, lord of Monviel [in the petition he is called Pons de 'Monwoyl'].
- 91
-
Same as above. For Brunet Aymeric, serjeant-at-arms.
Order to the constable of Bordeaux to account with Brunet Aymeric Emerik, serjeant-at-arms, the wages owed to him from his service to Edward II on land as well as on sea during the last war of Gascony 1 , as this latter petitioned the king on this matter before him and his coucil, and pay him according to what he finds suitable. The constable will have due allowance in his account.
By petition of C.
- 1.
- The war of St-Sardos, 1324-5
- 92
-
Same as above. For Master Aubert Mège.
1Order to John de Weston, constable of Bordeaux to check the mentioned indentures and memoranda: Aubert Mège Master Medici, clerk, petitioned the king before him and his council that victuals and other things were delivered on the king's order to him by Weston, constable of Bordeaux and his men, and indentures and memoranda were made on this matter, and these victuals and other things remained in possession of Mège as he said, because the aforesaid Weston denied he made indentures and still unjustly denies it to the great damage of the aforesaid Weston on what this latter petitioned the king to provide a remedy. If the constable notice that the victuals and other things were delivered to Mège according to the indentures and other memoranda, he has not to trouble the aforesaid Mège on this matter in the future.
By petition of C.
- 1.
- SC 8/159/7932 is the petition of Aubert Mège at the origin of this entry.
- 93
-
Same as above. For Lop-Bergunh de Bordeaux, castellan of the king's castle of Bayonne and prévôt of the same town.
1Order to the constable of Bordeaux to account with Lop-Bergunh de Bordeaux on these matters for all the time it was not accounted: Lop-Bergunh de Bordeaux Burdeg', castellan of the castle of Bayonne and prévôt of the same town petitioned the king before him and his council that he was not accounted for a long time of the revenues and farms of the aforesaid castle and prévôté, as well as other receipts for the wages owed to him for his keepership of the said castle, and also the expenses made by him for the repairing of the houses and walls of the said castle and other works, as well as some sums he paid at the order of the the seneschals of the duchy. After having accounted, the constable has to pay to Bordeaux according to what he finds suitable. The constable will have due allowance in his account.
By petition of C.
- 1.
- SC 8/293/14625 is the petition of Lop-Bergunh de Bordeaux at the origin of this entry. Bordeaux informed there the king that he has accounted with a constable of Bordeaux about the farm of the prévôté of Bayonne for 500l.parv.t. per year he has to pay each year and the annuities partaining to the castle of Bayonne as well as the whales taken at Biarritz on which Bordeaux is responsible. He has accounted with the constable of Bordeaux John Travers of his owed wages and of the expenses he made to repair the castle of Bayonne. But the current constable refused to pay these sums to him. He requested the king to order him to account since the time John Travers was constable of Bordeaux in order to pay him in chipotaines currency as he pays the farm and as it has been the case before. Similarly, the count of Foix owed him a certain sum of money as shown by some charters, on what this count has secured this sum on his goods and land of Béarn and Marsan [Bordeaux lent this sum at the order of the seneschals of the duchy mentioned in this Gascon Roll entry]. Bordeaux requested the king to order the seneschals of Gascony and the Landes to have full justice and to force the count of Foix to pay this sum.
- 94
-
Same as above. For Johan Guitard, clerk, and controller of the king's castle of Bordeaux.
Order to the seneschal of Gascony to inform himself about the following facts and to learn the names of the transgressors, invaders and criminals by inquiry and other means: theres is a quarrel where is involved Johan Guitard Guitardo, clerk and Guitardo controller of the castle of Bordeaux Burdeg'. Guitard with his family and all his goods were and still are under the king's safeguard by the king's letters patent and Guitard with the prévôt of Bordeaux went to a house of Bordeaux, where some criminals brought some Guitard's goods, in order to seize these goods in the king's hand according to the Bordeaux' customs. But Guilhem d'Aiguille Dagulha, damoiseau, brother of Dagulha Amaubin [III] de Barès, Warres lord of Montferrand Montis Ferrandi Warres mischievously hide in this house in purpose and walked the sword drawn towards Guitard in order to kill him, and later, united with his brother the lord of Montferrand, Thomas de Montferrand, Pey de Courbin Corbino 1 , Bénedeyt de Soulé Soler, Amaniu Colom Columb, their servants, accomplices and several others up to twenty persons with swords drawn as well with other weapons invading Guitard's house in crying "Kill! Kill!" (ad mortem, ad mortem) and intended to kill Guitard and all the family who was with him, and they wounded and almost killed some members of his family, leaving them dragging in a public street. They still want to kill Guitard and his family and that stops Guitard to exercise his office to his great damage and to the breach and contempt of the king's safeguard. The seneschal has to chastise all the persons he find guilty in order to scare those who want to act against the king, his servants or the persons who are under the king's safeguard. 2
By K.
- 1.
- There is a mistake here in the sentence of this entry as the lord of Montferrand and his brother are mentioned twice.
- 2.
- See the related entry entry 48.
- 95
-
Same as above. For Thomas de Hyuxhill.
2Order to the seneschal of Gascony, as Thomas de Hyuxhill petitioned the king before him and his council that because of his good service to Edward II and the current king, to grant him the chantry of the castle of La Réole Regula which is now outside the king's hand 1 , having it under the same condition others had it when this castle will revert to the king's hand, to grant him this chantry under the king's seal in use in the duchy.
By petition of C.
- 1.
- Then in French control.
- 2.
- SC 8/293/14617 is the petition of Thomas de Hyuxhill('Huixhulle' in the petition) at the origin of this entry. He is titled here as chaplain and asked the king, as a work of charity and for the souls of his father Edward II and his ancestors, to grant him the chantry of the chapel of La Réole, or any other in the Duchy that is vacant, when it comes into the king's hand, in compensation for his service to the king and his father.
- 96
-
1328, 20 May. Northampton. For Master Johan Guitard.
1Announcement that, as Johan Guitard Guitardi served well Edward I, Edward II and the current king, Edward I and Edward II granted for life to him by their letters the office of controller of the castle of Bordeaux Burdeg' and half of the revenues of the seal and counter-seal of contracts in Bordeaux, the current king confirms them to Guitard to be hold under the same conditions.
By petition of C. which has been certified by Oliver de Ingham, former seneschal of Gascony who has seen the letters of grant.
- 1.
- The first half of SC 8/49/2413 is at the origin of this entry. See also Rotuli Parliamentorum Anglie Hactenus Inediti, p.184 (Parliament of Southampton, Easter, 1328).
- 97
-
15 June. Worcester. For Arnaut de Poulouaout.
3Order to the constable of Bordeaux to account with Arnaut de Poulouaout Pulewaut 1 , as this latter petitioned the king before him and his council requesting that the king owed him wages for the time he was in the service of Edward II and the current king in the war of Gascony 2 , and of what will be found he has to pay Poulouaout as far as he can. The constable will have due allowance in his account.
By petition of C.
- 1.
- There are now the moors of Poulouaout in com. Caupenne, arr. Dax, dép. Landes, which were a part of the lordship of Poyloaut (the written form varies a lot) which was based in the neighbouring com. of Larbey. So the current form of this name is Poulouaout.
- 2.
- The war of St-Sardos, 1324-5.
- 3.
- SC 8/66/3299 is the petition of Arnaut de Poulouaout at the origin of this entry. There he specified that one part of his wages of the war of Gascony was owed to him.
- 97.1
-
Same as above.
1Similar king's letters to Auger de Saumont Somound.
By petition of C.
- 1.
- SC 8/74/3697 is the petition of Auger de Saumont at the origin of this act. There he requested the king that the constable of Bordeaux paid him his wages from the war of Gascony or allocate them on the baylie of Pouillon.
- 98
-
1328, 15 June. Worcester. For Pey [II] de Grailly, vicomte of Benauges and Castillon.
1Order to the seneschal of Gascony and the constable of Bordeaux to inform themselves on this matter: Pey[II] de GraillyGreilly, Greilly vicomte of Benauges Benaugiar' and Greilly Castillon Castelionis petitioned the king before him and his council as because the war between Edward II and the king of France in the duchy and he supported Edmund [of Woodstock], uncle of the current king and then lieutenant of Edward II in the said duchy, so he has lost his revenues and rights of jurisdiction he had in the towns of Langon Langoun and Bazas Vasato worthing 300l.st. per year as he asserted, so he requested the king to return them to him. After information on these rights of jurisdiction, and inform the king or the persons coming on behalf of the king for the reformation of the duchy, (...)??
By petition of C.
- 1.
- The first query of SC 8/160/7999, petition of Pey II de Grailly, vicomte of Benauges and Castillon, is clearly at the origin of this entry.
- 99
-
15 June. Winchester. For the same.
3Order to Pey[II] de GraillyGarily, Garily vicomte of Benauges Benaugiarum and Garily Castillon Castellionis to present his case on this matter: this latter petitioned the king before him and his council that the right of high jurisdiction (alta justicia) on Sainte-Croix-du-Mont Sancte Crucis de Monte was placed in the king hand at the occasion of a dissension between Jean [I] de Grailly Graily 1 , grandfather of Pey II de Grailly, and Roger de Leybourne Leyburn during the reign of Edward [I], grandfather of the current king, as it is shown in a public instrument made at his moment. Pey II asserted that this right of high jurisdiction have been granted to his prejudice to Guiraut de Tastes 2 by the current king. The king wants to revoke this latter grant and he asserts to Pey II he did not know the dissensions about this right of jurisdiction when the king granted to Tastes his own right. Notwithstanding his right to have this right of high jurisdiction, if he agrees to present his case before the king's men who are on behalf of the king in the regions of the duchy to reform its status, these latter will satisfy to his right notwhithstanding the grant to Tastes.
By petition of C.
- 1.
- He was the first vicomte of Benauges of the Grailly family.
- 2.
- Guiraut de Tastes was lord of Sainte-Croix-du-Mont.
- 3.
- The second article of SC 8/160/7999, petition of Pey II de Grailly, is at the origin of this entry.
- 100
-
Same as above. For the same.
4Order to Pey[II] de GraillyGarily, Garily vicomte of Benauges Benaugiarum and Garily Castillon Castellionis to present the letters he has of Edward I to the king's men who are on behalf of the king in the regions of the duchy to reform its status in order they check them and do what is suitable thereafter: Pey II de Grailly petitioned the king before him and his council that Edward [I] owed to Pey [VI] de Bordeaux Burdeg' 1 and the captal de Buch Bugz 2 for their wages and other services the sum of 1000l.st. and more as it is proved by the letters patent of Edward I. The king wants that Johan [II] de Grailly 3 , heir of the aforesaid Pey [VI de Bordeaux] and the captal de Buch, and their executor be paid of this sum.
By petition of C.
- 1.
- Pey VI de Bordeaux called 'lo Massip' (Gascon nickname meaning 'the minor') or 'lo joen' (the young) (d.c.1307) was lord of Puy-Paulin, Castelnau-de-Médoc and Certes and brother of Assalhida de Bordeaux (d. c.1329) who married in 1307 with Pey II de Grailly.
- 2.
- Pey-Amaniu de Bordeaux who was the uncle of Pey VI de Bordeaux and died without issue in 1300. Thus Assalhida de Bordeaux and her husband were his heirs. See his will dated 21 May 1300 in AHG, 45, p.183-195, no.LV (named p.183 as 'Pey Amaniu, captau de Buyhs, caueyr, filh qui fo dou noble baron en Pey [V] de Bordeu'). On the genealogy of the last Bordeaux, see Histoire de Bordeaux(1965), p.69-71, and Meaudre de Lapouyade, M., 'La famille de Bordeaux et les premiers captaux de Buch', in Actes de l'académie nationale des sciences, belles-lettres et arts de Bordeaux, 6e série, vol. XI, 1936-1938 (Bordeaux, 1939), p.75-115.
- 3.
- Son of Pey II de Grailly and Assalhida de Bordeaux.
- 4.
- The third article of SC 8/160/7999, petition of Pey II de Grailly, is at the origin of this entry.
- 101
-
Same as above. For the same.
3Order to the seneschal of Gascony and the constable of Bordeaux to have full information on the following matter and act thereafter according to the law and custom: Pey[II] de GraillyGreilly, Greilly vicomte of Benauges Benaugiarum and Greilly Castillon Castellionis petitioned the king before him and his council that the lords of Puy-Paulin Puch Paulyn of the past had, and there is no memory of the contrary, had their wines free of customs at Bordeaux as the burgesses of Bordeaux, but some king's ministers do not want to let his son Johan [II] de Grailly Greilly enjoys as it should this right as his mother 1 married a noble man 2 , and Johan is again troubled in this right to his great expense and his obvious despoilment, so it has been supplicated to the king to provide a suitable remedy on this matter.
By petition of C.
- 1.
- Assalhida de Bordeaux
- 2.
- Pey II de Grailly. There were traditionaly only four noble families who were allowed to be burgesses of Bordeaux (See Renouard, Y., Histoire de Bordeaux. Bordeaux sous les rois d'Angleterre (Bordeaux, 1965), p.344, n.1.), the most important being the lords of Puy-Paulin, lord of the small castle of Puy-Paulin situated in Bordeaux itself (which a tower, highly transformed in the 18th century, is still visible rue Paul Painlevé), and having probably some authorities on the surrounding of the parish of Puy-Paulin. Here the commune of Bordeaux seems to have challenged the transmission of the right of bourgeoisie, and the privileged pertaining to this status, from one noble family (the Bordeaux) to another one (the Grailly) even if it was by heritage.
- 3.
- The fourth article of SC 8/160/7999, petition of Pey II de Grailly, is at the origin of this entry.
- 102
-
1328, 23 June. Evesham. For Bertran [d'] Assalit.
1Order to the constable of Bordeaux to account with Bertran d'Assalit Assailly, as this latter petitioned the king before him and his council requesting that the king owed him arrears of several sums from the time he had the keepership of Penne[-d'Agenais] Penne as it is shown, he asserted, by four bills of several former constables of Bordeaux, and of what will be found he has to pay Assalit from the revenues of the duchy as far as he can. The constable will have due allowance in his account.
By petition of C.
- 1.
- 103
-
Same as above. For Arnaut de Durfort.
Order to the constable of Bordeaux to account with Arnaut de Durfort Duro Forti, as this latter petitioned the king before him and his council requesting that the king owed him several sums of money from the time he was in the service of Edward II and the current king during the war of Gascony 1 , and the wages allocated to him from the time he was banished from the duchy. And of what will be found in this account, the constable has to do a suitable payment to Durfort from the revenues of the duchy as far as he can. The constable will have due allowance in his account.
By petition of C.
- 1.
- The war of St-Sardos, 1324-5.
-
Same letters to:
- 103.1
-
Same as above.
Bertran Caillau Caillou
- 104
-
Same as above. For Bernat Martin, burgess of the king's town of Penne[-d'Agenais].
Order to the constable of Bordeaux to account with Bernat Martin Martyn, Martyn burgess of Penne[-d'Agenais] Penna, as this latter petitioned the king before him and his council requesting that the king owed him several sums of money for his wages from the time he was in the service of Edward II and the current king during the war of Gascony 1 , and the wages allocated to him from the time he was banished from the duchy. And of what will be found in this account, the constable has to do a suitable payment to Martin from the revenues of the duchy as far as he can. The constable will have due allowance in his account.
By petition of C.
- 1.
- The war of St-Sardos, 1324-5.
- 105
-
Same as above. For Master Bernat Destieu.
2Order to the constable of Bordeaux to account with Bernat Destieu Master Destien, clerk 1 , as this latter petitioned the king before him and his council requesting that the king owed him several sums of money for his wages from the time he was juge-mage of Agenais Agenesio. And of what will be found in this account, the constable has to do a suitable payment to Destieu from the revenues of the duchy as far as he can. The constable will have due allowance in his account.
By petition of C.
- 1.
- He was clerk of Penne-d'Agenais.
- 2.
- The petition SC 8/180/8956 of Bernart Desdieu is maybe at the origin of this entry.
- 106
-
Same as above. For Bos de Tarnac.
Order to the constable of Bordeaux to account with Bos de Tarnac Tarnak, as this latter petitioned the king before him and his council requesting that the king owed him several sums of money for his wages from the time he was in the service of Edward II and the current king during the war of Gascony 1 as well as the 'restor' of his horses lost in the same war. And of what will be found in this account, the constable has to do a suitable payment to Tarnac from the revenues of the duchy as far as he can. The constable will have due allowance in his account.
By petition of C.
- 1.
- The war of St-Sardos, 1324-5.
- 107
-
1328, 29 June. Evesham. For Arnaut de Durfort the younger.
Order to the constable of Bordeaux, as the king granted 200l.st. in support of the expenses made by Arnaut de Durfort the younger Duro Forti, iuniore for the king's service in the regions of the duchy and other regions and he paid to him 100l.st. from the king's treasury, to pay from the revenues of the duchy the aforesaid Durfort the younger of the remaining 100l.st. when him or his deputy will present the king's letters, receiving Durfort's letters of acquittances. The constable will have due allowance in his account.
By K. and C.
- 108
-
28 June. Evesham. For Master John de Weston, constable of Bordeaux.
Announcement that the king, in support of the expenses that made by John de Weston when he was constable of Bordeaux, granted 100m.st. above the customary annual fee that he had to receive in this office, 100m.st. based on the revenues of the duchy to be received from the hands of the constable of Bordeaux and the king wants that these 100m.st. be annually allocated in Weston's account as long he was constable of Bordeaux.
By letter of the chancellor.
- 109
-
29 June. Evesham. For the same.
Letter to Master John de Weston, clerk, constable of Bordeaux that in support of the expenses he made in the king's service in the regions of the duchy and other regions the king granted him 100m.st. whose half has to be paid to him from the king's treasure. The king wants that Weston receives the remaining 50m.st. from the revenue of the duchy and he will have due allowance in his account.
By letter of the chancellor.
- 110
-
30 June. Evesham. For Pey de Montauzer (...).
Order to the constable of Bordeaux to receive from Pey de Montauzer Monte Oserii, Monte Oserii prévôt of Blaye Bleyves 600 l.t. of new b. for the payment of his office, without any change. In fact, the king granted on 16 April 1327 1 by his letters patent the prévôté of Blaye Bleyves with its appurtenances to be hold from the 16 April 1327 for a two years period rendering per year to the king 600l.parv.t. as it is specified in the king's letters, but the same Montauzer petitioned the king to render for this office 600l.t. now in use in Bordelais Burdegal' that are new Bordelais (Burdegalens' novorum). The king agreed that the aforesaid Montauzer pays now and in the future for his keepership 600 l.t. of new b..
By letter of the chancellor.
- 1.
- See C 61/39, entry no.58.
- 111
-
28 June. Evesham. For John de Haustede.
Announcement that the king granted to John de Haustede, seneschal of Gascony, in support of the expenses he made in this office, 200m.st. to be received from the revenues of the duchy by the hands of the constable of Bordeaux.
By letter of the chancellor.
- 112
-
28 June. Evesham.
1And it is ordered to the constable of Bordeaux to pay to John de Haustede the said 200m.st. from the revenues of the duchy receiving from Haustede the king's letters and his letters of acquittances. The constable will have due allowance in his account.
- 1.
- It has been forgotten to copy this act following the previous entry, so this entry is written in very small characters because it was copied between two entries already written.
- 113
-
Same as above. For Berduc [de Mestre], valet of Master Austen Jourdain of Gascony.
Order to all his baillifs and liege men, as the king granted for one year under his safeguard Berduc [de Mestre], valet of Master Austen Jourdain Jurdan of Gascony Vascon', his men and all his goods, because he went from the continent to the kingdom [of England] to bring to the king some letters about the state of the duchy and he has been despoiled in this kingdom of these letters, his goods and chattels by some malefactors as he asserted, to maintain, protect and defend the aforesaid Berduc, his men and all his goods in the pursuance of his business. And they have not to permit to have them injured, molested or damaged. And if something has be tempted against them, they have to correct it without delay.
By K.
- 114
-
1328, 30 May. Evesham. For the king.
Order to John de Weston, constable of Bordeaux to pay the money delivered by the king from his treasure as well as the fees and wages from the revenues of the duchy and to do other necessary expenses for the defence and the salvation of the said duchy (...) and he will have due allowance in his account.
By K. and letter of the chancellor.
- 115
-
26 June. Evesham. For Arnaut de Lescapon.
Announcement that the king granted at will to Arnaut de Lescapon Lescapoun 1 the office of the business of the king's money (assaiatoris monete nostre) in the duchy of Aquitaine perceiving in this office the customary fees and wages.
By p.s.
- 1.
- There is a placename named 'Lescapon' in com. Queyrac, arr. Lesparre-Médoc, dép. Gironde.
- 116
-
Same as above.
And it is ordered to the seneschal of Gascony and the constable of Bordeaux to deliver to Arnaut [de Lescapon] this keepership following the content of the king's letters.
By p.s.
- 117
-
1328, 8 August. York. For Jacmes de Courbin of Bordeaux.
Order to the seneschal of Gascony and the constable of Bordeaux as well as the mayor, jurats and all the community of the town of Bordeaux to be cooperative with Jacmes de Courbin Corby of Bordeaux Burdeg' who has been deputed by Richard de la Pole 1 , the king's [chief] butler (pinterna) to the town of Bordeaux and other towns in the duchy about the wines for the consumption of the king's household (...) and send to the king as soon as possible.
By K.
- 1.
- See bibliographical notes on Richard de la Pole (d. 1345) under the name of his brother Sir William de la Pole (d. 1366) in the article written in the ODNB by E.B. Fryde.
- 118
-
Same as above. For Bernat Grimoard and Arnaut Carbonel, merchants.
Order to the seneschals, constables, castelans, prévôts, mayors, mayors, sub-mayors, bayles, ministers and liege men of the duchy, as the king granted his safeguard for one year to Bernat Grimoard Grymoardi and Arnaut Carbonel, merchants, buying wines, others goods and merchandise in the regions of the duchy to bring them to the kingdom [of England], to not to trouble them in this business, and they have not to permit to have them injured, molested or damaged. And if something has be tempted against them, they have to correct it without delay. Grimoard and Carbonel have to pay the customs on their wines and goods.
By K.
- 119
-
1328, 10 August. York. For the king.
Order to the seneschal of Gascony or his lieutenant to inform themselves on this matter: from the report of some faithful men of the duchy the king has understood that Pey de Baude Baudo, his wife, his son Pey [de Baude], Ramon Rolland Roland, his son and their men treacherously killed by night in his house of Bordeaux Burdeg' Guilhem-Sants de Mirail Miraillo and the punishment provided for such a murder according to the local fors and customs has not been enforced by the mayor of Bordeaux or others king's ministers, so the authors of this treachery, and other treacherous men and malefactors of these regions authors of homicides and other harms in the contempt of the king oppose the king's peace in the obvious terror of the people of these parts. The seneschal of Gascony has to inform himself on the said murder and treachery and manage to know the names of its authors and all who will happen to be guilty and punish them as it should be according to the local fors and customs with the swiftness that allows the law, in order that this treachery does not remain unpunished.
- 120
-
Same as above. For Master Johan Guitard.
Order to the seneschal of Gascony or his lieutenant to inform themselves on this matter: from the report of some faithful men of the duchy the king has understood thatBernat de Campredon Campo Rotundo 1 and Contor, his wife, Pey de Courbin Corvino, Johan Pinsan Pynsam and some other servants of Johan Guitard Master Guytardi, controller of the castle of Bordeaux were treacherously despoiled in Bordeaux of their jewels and other goods and chattels up to the value of 200l., and the malefactors killed a certain Pey Petrum, a servant of Guitard and perpetrated other damages and crimes in the king's contempt, Guitard's great damage and againt the king's peace. The punishment provided for such a murder according to the local fors and customs has not been enforced by the mayor of Bordeaux or others king's ministers, so the authors of this treachery, so the criminals of these regions have no fear to perpretate crimes. The seneschal of Gascony has to inform himself on the said murder and crimes and manage to know the names of its authors and all who will happen to be guilty and punish them as it should be according to the local fors and customs with the swiftness that allows the law, in order that this treachery does not remain unpunished.
- 1.
- There was a place called Campredon (in Latin Campus Rotundus) in the parish of Saint-Seurin of Bordeaux.
- 121
-
1328, 25 November. Westminster. For Guilhem Bel.
Order to the prévôt of Blaye Blaive to hear before him the quarrel of Guilhem Bel who petitioned the king and complained that Guiraut Bernard, king's general serjeant of the duchy owed for certain reasons to Bel the sum of 60s.st. but refused, as Bel asserts, to pay him. The prévôt has to make a swift full justice on that according the law and the local the fors and customs.
- 122
-
28 June. Evesham.
Letter to Arnaut-Gassie [du Foussat], lord of Thouars Toars to thank him for his loyalty towards the king and his business and the king wants to reward him and compensate his damage he suffered for the service of the current king and his ancestors. The king requests him to, as he did until now, save and defend the king's rights and to help and support the king's ministers of these regions [of the duchy]. And soon, by the ordinance of the king's great council the king gathered for this reason, the king will send such news who will be sufficient for the king, him and the king's friends.
-
In the same way it is written to:
- 122.1
-
Same as above.
the prévôt, jurats and community of Saint-Macaire Seint Makare; Arnaut-Guilhem [d'Audaux], lord of Audaux Audans; the lord of Osserain Asseran; Guilhem de Caumont Camount, Ponts [de Castillon], lord of Castillon Chastelion; Pey[II] de GraillyGreili, vicomte of Benauges; Fortaner d'Esgoarrebaque Guarbacca, kt; Johan [de] Mauléon Maulione; Pey de Moncaut Monccaup; Pey [de Marsan], lord of Marsan Marzan 1 ; Arnaut de Durfort Dureford, kt; Ramon Durand Duraunt, kt 2 ; Johan de Bourg Burgh; the lord of Langoiran Logayran 3 ; Bernat [de Poudenx], lord of Poyanne Puyane; Amaniu du Foussat Fossat, kt; Ramon-Guilhem [de Caupenne], lord of Caupenne; the consuls and community of Cazaubon Cassalbou; Bernat de Sémens Semeux, kt; Pey [de Castelnau], lord of Castelnau[-Tursan] Castelneof; the prévôt, jurats and community of Saint-Sever Seint Sever; the jurats and community of Saint-Gein Seint Gyn; Guilhem-Sants [II de Pommiers], lord of Pommiers Pomers; Dénot [de Doazit], lord of Doazit; the lord of Ornon Ornoun; the lord of Poulouaout Puyhaut 4 ; Arnaut de Beauville Pueville; Arnaut-Ramon [d'Aspremont], vicomte of Orthe Dorte;
- 1.
- The Marsan was a vicomté as well as a lordship situated in the east of the Landes around Mont-de-Marsan and Roquefort.
- 2.
- Ramon Durand was then the seneschal of the Landes
- 3.
- Bernat d'Escoussans.
- 4.
- Arnaut-Guilhem de Poulouaout.
- 122.2
-
Same as above.
Johan, lord of Lamothe la Mote,; the lord of Tilh 1 ; Arnaut-Gassie [du Foussat], [lord of] Thouars Toars; the lord of Agassac Agasak 2 ; Ramfré [I] de Durfort, lord of Bajamont; Arnaut-Alaman, lord of Benquet Benket; the mayor, jurats and community of Dax Daqs'; Ramon-Arnaut [de Gerderest], lord of Gerderest Gerzerest; Guiraut de Lamothe la Mote, la Mote lord of Vaux des Vaux; Pey de Béarn Berne, Berne lord of Saint-Maurice Seint Mouriz; Assiu de Savignac Savynak; Galhart de Tastes, kt 3 ; the mayor, jurats and community of Bordeaux Burdeux; Arnaut Aymon Esmon, kt; Ramon de Vaux; [Arnaut-Gassie de Got, called the]Basque de Lomagne Bascle de Lomaigne, Bascle de Lomaigne lord of Puyguilhem Puy Gilliam; the mayor, jurats and community of Bourg Burgh; Johan de Mauléon called Monéder Maulion, Moneder ; Arnaut de Durfort Dureford, Dureford captain of Penne[-d'Agenais] Penne; Sénebrun [IV de Lesparre], lord of Lesparre la Sparre; Pey de Soulé du Soler 4 ; Ramon-Bernat de Ste-Foy Seint Foy; Ramon de Miossens Mil Sentz; the mayor, jurats and commune of Saint-Émilion Seint Milion; the lord of Tombeboeuf Tombeboef 5 ; Guiraut de Tastes, kt 6 ; the prévôt, castellans, jurats and community of Blaye Bleyves; Pey Caillau Calliou, Calliou lord of Podensac Podensak; the councillors and community of Penne[-d'Agenais] Penne;
- 1.
- Lubat de Tilh.
- 2.
- Galhart d'Agassac
- 3.
- Of Saint-Macaire.
- 4.
- Of Bordeaux.
- 5.
- Anessans de Caumont
- 6.
- Lord of Sainte-Croix-du-Mont
- 122.3
-
Same as above.
Bertran de Lescours Lestours, kt; Auger de Poudenx Podeux; Bertran Caillau Caillou 1 ; Arnaut-Guilhem [de Béarn], lord of Lescun Lescu; Bernat [de] Béarn, called l'Aspès Bern, Aspes; Pey Auger, kt 2 ; Bidau [II de Poudenx], lord of Poudenx Podeux; Johan Colom Columb 3 ; Bernat de Bruget Briget 4 ; Guilhem-Aymeric de Barbotan, kt; the mayor, jurats and community of Bayonne Bayon'; Ramon d'Astaffort Destafford; the lord of Mataplan Mate Plane; the lord of Rauzan Roazan 5 ; Amaniu du Foussat Fossat 6 ; Galhart de Got Gout 7 ; the lord of Landiras Laudiras 8 ; the lord of Poyaller Puyaler 9 ; Guilhem[-Arnaut III d'Auros], lord of Auros; Arnaut de Saint-Aubin Seint Aubyn 10 ; Gassie-Arnaut de Navailles Navailes 11 ; the jurats and community of Roquefort-de-Marsan Rocheford de Marzan; Guilhem-Ramon Colom Coloum 12 ; the good people and community of Sainte-Quitterie Seint Quitere; Amaubin[III] de BarèsVares, Vares lord of Montferrand Mountferant; Bonet de Soulé Soler 13 ; Pey de Gabarret Gavarrit 14 ; Arnaut de Lalande la Launde 15 ; Guilhem-Ramon de Caumont Camount; Fortaner de Lescun 16 ; the mayor, jurats and community of Libourne Leiburn'; the consuls and community of Puymirol.
- 1.
- Burgess of Bordeaux
- 2.
- Of Bourg.
- 3.
- of Bordeaux
- 4.
- Burgess of Puymirol.
- 5.
- Guilhem-Amaniu de Madaillan.
- 6.
- Lord of Madaillan.
- 7.
- Lord of Arbanats
- 8.
- Galhart de Saint-Symphorien.
- 9.
- Arnaut de Saint-Aubin.
- 10.
- Citizen of Bordeaux.
- 11.
- Lord of Sault
- 12.
- Citizen of Bordeaux.
- 13.
- Of Bordeaux.
- 14.
- Former co-lord of Langon.
- 15.
- Lord of La Brède.
- 16.
- Lord of Louvigny.
- 123
-
1328, 28 June. Evesham.
Letter to John de Haustede, seneschal of Gascony, Bérart [I] d'Albret la Bret, knights, and Arnaut de Montpezat Mountpesat informing them that the king has kept next to him John de Weston, clerk, constable of Bordeaux in order to tell him all his thoughts on the message him and Huc de Gavaudun Gavadon brought to him on behalf of Haustede, Albret and Montpezat. Weston explained that his stay next to the council the king summoned for this case could be perilous to his office and damaging to the king and his business in these regions [of the duchy] and he requested the king to be able to withdraw towards them 1 and he brings the intention on the said message as swift as he was adviced to do. The king sent back at his request the aforesaid constable with part of the cash to help the king's people and reinforce the king's garrisons if necessary, according to their judgment, until the coming of more support the king thinks to send according to the ordonnances of the king's council.
- 1.
- Weston, Albret and Montpezat
- 124
-
Same as above.
Letter to Arnaut-Guilhem [IV de Gramont], lord of Gramont Egermond where the current king thanks him about his help on his mother Isabella [of France], queen of England and his business concerning the kingdom of Navarre Navarr' especially concerning the advice and help given to the king's ambassadors, and he asks him to continue on this way, promising that him and his mother will feel bound to him and will reward him suitably. The king asks Gramont to write back to him with suggestions about the Navarre business.
- 125
-
Same as above.
Letter to Guilhem [de Caumont], lord of Caumont Cavo Monte. The king is aware of his losses in the king's service which, due to ill-fortune, have not been restored, so the asks him to wait a little bit longer to be restored. The king has written to him before about Isabella [of France], queen of England and his business; and William Geykyn and Ramon Durand Durandi have also explained this business to him, and he replied he was willing to support on this matter for which the king thanks him. The king requests him to give all the help and advice he can to preserve his and his mother's rights and he promises to reward him when possible.
-
Similar letters have been sent to:
- 125.1
-
Same as above.
Arnaut de Durfort Duro Forti
- 125.2
-
Same as above.
Bertran Caillau Caillou
- 126
-
Same as above.
Order to Ramon de Miossens Millesantis, Millesantis castellan of the king's castle of Mauléon Malo Leone as the lord of Luxe Luxa 1 in Navarre Navarr' is in his custody, is directed by his advice and can bring a great place 2 in the kingdom of Navarre to support his mother Isabella [of France], queen of England and his rights. So the king orders Miossens to deal with him in such way he supports his mother's and the recovery of their rights, not allowing him to assent to the election allegedly made in Navarre to the prejudice of their rights. 3 If he acts diligently, he would be rewarded.
- 1.
- Arnaut-Lop II de Luxe
- 2.
- Probably a fortress.
- 3.
- After the death of the last Capetian, Charles IV, king of France and Navarre (1322-1328) on 1 February 1328, the Cortes de Navarre designated on 1 May 1328 Jeanne, daughter of the late Louis X, king of France and Navarre as queen of Navarre. This passage of this entry permits to understand that Isabella of France and Edward III claimed the throne of Navarre.
- 127
-
Same as above.
Letter to the lord of Luxe Luxa 1 in Navarre Navarr' where the king thanks him for his support concerning the business of his mother Isabella [of France], queen of England and him, of which he has been informed by Ramon de Miossens Millesanctis and Ramon Durand Durandi. The king asks him to continue to assist them in the recovery of their rights and feel himself bound to him in exchange. He asks him to give credence to Miossens and Durand on what they say to him on behalf of the king.
- 128
-
Same as above.
Letter to Ramon Durand Durandi, Durandi seneschal of the Landes Landarum where the king thanks him for his great effort and attention concerning the business of his mother Isabella [of France], queen of England and him concerning the parts of Navarre Navarr' and the duchy of Aquitaine, asking him to continue this and to bring it to a happy outcome, and to have talks the most secret and suitable talks with the count of Foix Fuxi 1 and others who seem suitable to him in order to have them as adherents of the king's party in the recovering of his mother's and his rights, as Durand wrote to the king. He entrusts all this to carry out to him and when it seems fitting, he will give him a good reward.
- 129
-
1328, 20 August. Pontefract. For Giovanni Bonguidi of Lucca (...) .
Announcement that the king, at the request of Ponts de Coutron Master Controne 1 the king had granted on 16 June 1327 2 to Giovanni Bonguidi of Lucca Luca the keepership of the dies of the king's mint (custodiam cuneorum monete nostre) of Bordeaux Burdeg to have for a five years period with all the things partaining to this office under the same conditions that others had this keepership before, as it is shown in the king's letters patent. The king grants now at will the same office to Bonguidi as long as he behave well in its exercise.
By p.s.
- 1.
- There is a placename named Coutron in com. St-Léger-de-Balson, arr. Langon, dép. Gironde, and another one in com. Téthieu, arr. Dax, dép. Landes.
- 2.
- See C 61/39, entry no.100.
- 130
-
20 August. Pontefract. For the same..
Announcement that the king the king had granted on 7 January 1328 1 to Giovanni Bonguidi of Lucca Luca the keepership of the king's mint (custodiam monete nostre) of Bordeaux Burdeg to have for a five years period with all the things partaining to this office under the same conditions that others had this keepership before, as it is shown in the king's letters patent. The king grants now at will the same office to Bonguidi as long as he behave well in its exercise.
By p.s.
- 1.
- See C 61/39, entry no.110.
- 131
-
20 August. Pontefract. For Gassie de Podensac.
1Order to the constable of Bordeaux, as Gassie de Podensac Podensak petitioned the king before him and his council that Edward I owed to him the sum of 86l. 2s. 9d.st. and ordered by his letters to the constable of Bordeaux to pay him this sum or to make suitable allocations to pay it,but the constable did nothing; to check the letters that the said Podensac has, as he asserts, about this sum and what he will be able to account he has to pay him without postponement of the king's business in these parts.
By petition of C.
- 1.
- The first part of the petition SC 8/263/13103 of Gassie de Podensac, replied in RG IV, no.1589, p 460-461, 12 May 1316, is about this sum of 86l. 2s. 9d.st..
- 132
-
20 August. Pontefract. For Ramon de Miossens. 1 .
Announcement that because of his good service the king granted at will the keepership of the castle of Mauléon Malo Leonis to Ramon de Miossens Mille Sanctis under the same conditions that the said Miossens had this keepership by the grant of Edward II.
By petition of C.
- 1.
- It is written Extractur in the margin.
- 133
-
Same as above. For Fortaner de Burgès..
Order to the seneschal of Gascony and the constable of Bordeaux or their lieutenants to inform themselves on the service Fortaner de Burgès Burges' 1 made to Edward II: Burgès petitioned the king that because his good service to Edward II in his war of Scotland Scotie, as well for the restoration of his possessions movables and immovables worthing 100l. lost during the war of Gascony, Edward II granted to him at will the scribania of the town of Agen Agenn', and thereafer Hugh le Despenser the Younger removed him from this office. The seneschal and the constable have to reward Burgès according to his service to the king.
- 1.
- There is a Burges in com. St-Julien-en-Born, arr. Dax, dép. Landes and another in com. Le Passage, arr. Agen, dép. Lot-et-Garonne. This name could be as well Bourges or Bourgès and it exists Bourges, in com. Laurède, ar. Dax, dép. Landes; Bourges, in com. Villeton, ar. Marmande, dép. Lot-et-Garonne; Bourges, in com. Ste-Colombe-en-Brulhois, arr. Agen, dép. Lot-et-Garonne; Bourgès, in com. Escassefort, arr. Marmande, dép. Lot-et-Garonne and Bourgès, in com. Beauville, arr. Agen, dép. Lot-et-Garonne. These placenames seem to strongly suggest that this Fortaner de Burges may have been originating from Agenais.
- 134
-
Same as above. For Pey Descors of Bayonne..
Order to the seneschal of Gascony and the constable of Bordeaux or their lieutenant to grant to Pey Descors Descortz of Bayonne Baiona a 'baylie' (or office), in compensation for the office of the keepership of the king's mint of Bordeaux Burdeg' he formerly received from the king, as this latter granted this office to Giovanni Bonguidi of Lucca Luca for five complete years.
By petition of C.
- 135
-
Same as above. For William Chamberlein 1 .
Order to the seneschal of Gascony and the constable of Bordeaux, as William Chamberlein Chamberleyns petitioned the king that for his zealous service to the king in the regions of the duchy he receives the baylie of Saint-Macaire Sancto Machario in farm under the same conditions that enjoyed Bernat de Bron before the arrival of Edmund [of Woodstock], earl of Kent in the duchy 2 (...), to grant at will this baylie in farm to Chamberlein if this baylie has not been granted to someone else at the time the baylies were farmed.
By petition of C.
- 1.
- It is written Extractur in the margin.
- 2.
- As king's lieutenant there
- 136
-
1328, 22 August. Pontefract. For Pey Frésapa, burgess of the town of Penne[-d'Agenais]. .
Order to the seneschal of Gascony and the constable of Bordeaux to inform themselves if the soka has been granted to the burgesses of Penne[-d'Agenais] Penne to enclose their town. Pey Frésapa Fresapa 1 had promised to complete a section of the said enclosure of one hundred forty brachia in long and three brachia in high, but the collectors of the money coming from the soka did use the said money for other purposes in delay of the enclosure of the said town, so Frésapa requested the king to order the collectors of the money to pay him the money owed to him to build the part of the wall he is responsible for. The seneschal and the constable have to appoint some honnest people to audit the account of the revenues of the said soka, they have to pay to Frésapa what is owed to him according to the account and all the rest of revenues has to be expended under good guidance to enclose the town.
By petition of C.
- 1.
- There is one local placename called "Frésapa" in com. Penne-d'Agenais, arr. Villeneuve-sur-Lot, dép. Lot-et-Garonne, and another one com. Fumel, arr. Villeneuve-sur-Lot, dép. Lot-et-Garonne.
- 137
- 138
-
22 August. Pontefract. For the same.
Order to the constable of Bordeaux to check the account and bills mentioned there: Pey Frésapa Fresapa, Fresapa burgess of Penne[-d'Agenais] Penne petitioned the king that he has been in Edward II's service during the first war between this latter and the king of France, with six men-at-arms and ten serjeants and in the last war that was in the duchy he was serving the same king with three men-at-arms and four serjeants, and there are 300l.parv.t. in arrears of his wages for this period, as it is shown by the account made by the said Frésapa in presence of John Travers, clerk, former constable of Bordeaux and by bills sealed by the said Travers and Master Thomas de Askeby, then lieutenant of the said constable. Of what the constable will notice is owed to Frésapa, he has to pay it, without postponing the king business in the regions of the duchy. And he has to receive from the said Frésapa the said bills as well as his letters of acquittances. The constable will have due allowance in his account.
By petition of C.
- 139
-
Same as above. For Reynaut de Fonte Caprino .
Order to the seneschal of Gascony to permit to Reynaut de Fonte Caprino, to have the office of king's proctor in the town of Penne[-d'Agenais] Penne and on other castles and town of Agenais Agenn', as long he behave well in it, as he petitioned the king that Oliver de Ingham when he was seneschal of the duchy for Edward II granted him by his letters patent under the king's seal in use in the duchy. Ingham certified in front of the king and his council that the said Fonte Caprino behaved well in the exercise of this office.
By petition of C.
- 140
-
Same as above. For the same.
Order to the seneschal of Gascony and the constable of Bordeaux to account with Reynaut de Fonte Caprino of the wages owed to him from the last war in the duchy: Fonte Caprino petitioned the king he was in his service with three serjeants during the last war in the duchy and it was owed to him the sum of 138l. 19s. 6d.parv.t.. Of what the constable will notice is owed to Fonte Caprino, he as to pay it, without postponing the king business in the parts of the duchy. And he has to receive from the said Fonte Caprino the said bills as well as his letters of acquittances. The constable will have due allowance in his account.
By petition of C.
- 141
-
Same as above. For Johan Merle, burgess of the king's town of Penne[-d'Agenais].
Order to the seneschal of Gascony and the constable of Bordeaux to account with Johan Merle, burgess of Penne [-d'Agenais] Penne who petitioned the king that he has been in king's service during the last war in the duchy, with two men-at-arms and four serjeants and and there are 271l. 12s.parv.t. owed to him for his wages for this period, as it is shown by the account made by the said Merle in presence of the clerks John de Weston and John Travers, then successive constables of Bordeaux. Of what the constable will find is owed to Merle, he as to pay it, receiving his letters of acquittances. The constable will have due allowance in his account.
By petition of C.
- 142
-
1328, 20 August. Pontefract. For Bernat de Bernade.
Order to the seneschal of Gascony and the constable of Bordeaux or their lieutenant to account with Bernat de Bernade 1 who petitioned the king that he has been in Edward II and the current king's service during the last war in the duchy, with six men-at-arms and twenty five serjeants and and there are 83l. 12d.parv.t. owed to him for his wages for this period, as it is shown, as asserts Bernade, by the letters of John de Haustede, then seneschal of Gascony. Of what the constable will find is owed to Bernade, he as to pay it, receiving Haustede's letters as well as Bernade's letters of acquittances. The constable will have due allowance in his account.
By petition of C.
- 1.
- Bernade is a Gascon family name and the names of at least two local place names: Bernade, com. Arsac, arr. Bordeaux, dép. Gironde and Bernade, com. Labatut, arr. Dax, dép. Landes.
- 143
-
12 September. Swineshead. For Hélias Gagnol, clerk.
Order to the all the king's bayles and liege men of the duchy, as the king took in his safeguard Hélias Gagnol Ganhola, clerk, for three years, to maintain and protect Gagnol's men, things and all this legitimate possessions from unlawfull injuries and violence according to their competence. And if anything has been recently unlawfully attempted against them, they have to repeal it and correct it without delay.
- 144
-
16 September. Wisbech. For Bernat-Etz [V d'Albret], lord of Albret.
Announcement that the king grants compensations to Bernat-Etz [V d'Albret], lord of Albret Lebreto, as he supports with ardour and loyalty the recovering of the king's hereditary rights in the kingdom of France Franc' and in the duchy of Aquitaine, the king promises that him, his heirs and successors to compensate him if it happens to the said earl, his wife, heirs, successors, servants or his adherents at the occasion of a war or a conflict between the king and the French (Gallicos) that his present and future castles, lands, towns, cities or his possessions, some rights, deniers or his movables and real estates are by force occupied or seized by the French, the king will compensate him with cities, towns, castles, lands and rights occupied in the duchy by Charles [IV], former king of France at the time of Edward II which had returned in the king's hands if it is possible within a period of five years or as soon as possible, and it it appears it is not possible to do it he will receive other king's lands in the same duchy, and if it is not possible he will receive compensation in having allocated and delivered some suitable places within the king's kingdom [of England] and possessions within the mentioned period [of five years] after his possessions has been lost, to be hold under the same conditions and manners he first hold his lost castles, lands and goods. And after this period of five years, the king promises if it has been delays in the these mentioned allocations and deliveries or anything else, to pay their value per year at the castle of Bordeaux Burdegal' by the hands of the constable of Bordeaux, or at the Tower of London or at the king's Exchequer, if at the castle of Bordeaux it is not possible to honor this commitment. And if at the occasion of the war or the conflicts which existed in the duchy during the time of the said kings 1 the current king hold in his hands the lands, possessions, some rights or goods of him, his wife, heirs, successors, servants or his adherents, the king promises to fully restore as he supports the king as it is specified above. And the king promises the same thing to his brothers Guitart d'Albret Lebreto, vicomte of Tartas 2 , Bérart[I] d'AlbretLebreto, kt, Lebreto lord of Vayres Wayris and Lebreto Rions Ryoncio as well as their sister Matha d'Albret Lebreto, Lebreto lady of Castelmoron Castro Morone and Lebreto Gensac Gensaco. And on that the king commits himself, his heirs and successors and all his present and future goods, movables and real estates, he promises besides to the said count to fully include the count, his servants and adherents in the truce or peace the king will do with the French keeping them immune.
- 1.
- Edward II and Charles IV.
- 2.
- The text write Bernat-Guitart d'Albret (Bernardo Guitardo de Lebreto), but is an error for Guitard d'Albret.
- 145
-
Same as above. For the same.
-
The same letters has been written to:
- 145.1
-
Same as above. For Guitart d'Albret.
Guitart d'Albret Lebreto, Lebreto vicomte of Tartas Tartazieti
- 145.2
-
Same as above. For Bérart d'Albret. 1
Bérart[I] d'AlbretLebreto, kt, lord of Vayres and Rions
- 1.
- The texte writes Bernat (Bernardo) d'Albret, but it is a mistake for Bérart.
- 145.3
-
Same as above. For Ramon, vicomte of Fronsac.
Ramon [VI de Fronsac], vicomte of Fronsac Fronciaci.
- 145.4
-
Same as above. For Matha d'Albret.
Matha d'Albret Lebreto, Lebreto lady of Bergerac Brageriaco and Lebreto Pons Ponte 1
- 1.
- This Matha d'Albret (d.1338) was the lady of Castelmoron[-d'Albret] and Gensac mentioned above. She was lady of Bergerac, Pons, Castelmoron[-d'Albret] and Gensac since her marriage with Hélias-Rudel de Pons alias Renaud de Pons (d.1334), lord of Bergerac and Pons, on 2 May 1314. See Marquette, J.-B., 'Le mariage d'Élie Rudel de Bergerac et de Mathe d'Albret, le 2 mai 1314', in Bulletin de la Société historique et archéologique du Périgord, 135 (2008), p. 547-558.
- 146
-
1328, 2 September. Nottingham.
Order to John de Haustede 1 , seneschal of Gascony,...
By K. and C.
- 1.
- On the roll it is written 'Roberto de Haustede', but it is an error for John de Haustede.
- 147
-
1 September. Nottingham.
Announcement to the aldermen (scabinis) and consuls of the town of Penne[-d'Agenais] Penne that following their letters adressed to the king where they complained about some damages made to them and their community by Arnaut de Durfort Duro Forti and his son 1 , captains of the king's castle of Penne-d'Agenais. The king ordered John de Haustede 2 , seneschal of the duchy to do do what is possible to conclude without delay for the king's honor and their peace on this matter.
By K. and C.
- 1.
- Arnaut de Durfort
- 2.
- On the roll it is written 'Roberto de Haustede', but it is an error for John de Haustede.
- 148
-
16 September. Wisbech. For Johan [I d'Armagnac], count of Armagnac and etc. and vicomte of Lomagne.
Announcement that the king grants compensations to Johan [I d'Armagnac], count of Armagnac, Fezensac Armaniaci, Fezensiaci, Rodez Rodes and vicomte of Lomagne and Auvillar Leomanie, Alti Villaris as he supports with ardour and loyalty the recovering of the king's hereditary rights in the kingdom of France Franc' and in the duchy of Aquitaine, the king promises that him, his heirs and successors to compensate him if it happens to the said earl, his wife, heirs, successors, servants or his adherents at the occasion of a war or a conflict between the king and the French (Gallicos) that his present and future castles, lands, towns, cities or his possessions, some rights, deniers or his movables and real estates are by force occupied or seized by the French, the king will compensate him with cities, towns, castles, lands and rights occupied in the duchy by Charles [IV], king of France at the time of Edward II which had returned in the king's hands if it is possible within a period of five years or as soon as possible, and it it appears it is not possible to do it he will receive other king's lands in the same duchy, and if it is not possible he will receive compensation in having allocated and delivered some suitable places within the king's kingdom [of England] and possessions within the mentioned period 1 after his possessions has been lost, to be hold under the same conditions and manners he first hold his lost castles, lands and goods. And after this period of five years, the king promises if it has been delays in the these mentioned allocations and deliveries or anything else, to pay their value per year at the castle of Bordeaux Burdegal' by the hands of the constable of Bordeaux, or at the Tower of London or at the king's Exchequer, if at the castle of Bordeaux it is not possible to honor this commitment. And if at the occasion of the war or the conflicts which existed in the duchy during the time of the said kings 2 the current king hold in his hands the lands, possessions, some rights or goods of him, his wife, heirs, successors, servants or his adherents, the king promises to fully restore as he supports the king as it is specified above. And on that the king commits himself, his heirs and successors and all his present and future goods, movables and real estates, he promises besides to the said count to fully include the count, his servants and adherents in the truce or peace the king will do with the French keeping them immune.
- 1.
- of five years
- 2.
- Edward II and Charles IV.
-
The same letters has been written to:
- 148.1
-
Same as above. For Gaston de Béarn.
Gaston de Béarn Bearnio, Bearnio count of Foix Fuxi 1
- 1.
- It is an error: the count of Foix was then named Gaston II de Foix, count of Foix, his grandfather Roger-Bernat III de Foix became vicomte of Béarn in 1290 at the death of vicomte Gaston VII de Moncade, because he was married to this latter's daughter and heiress Margarida de Moncada (or de Béarn). At the death of his grandfather in 1302, his father Gaston I de Foix-Béarn inherited the county of Foix and the vicomté of Béarn.
- 148.2
-
Same as above. For Gaston d'Armagnac.
Gaston d'Armagnac Armaniaco, Armaniaco vicomte of Fezensaguet Fezensagues
- 148.3
-
Same as above. For Rotger d'Armagnac.
- 1.
- Rotger d'Armagnac, uncle of count Johan I d'Armagnac, bishop of Lavaur since 1317. Following the will of his brother Bernat VI, count of Armagnac - the father of Johan I - he had exercised the regency over the Gascon domains of Johan I during his minority.
- 149
-
1328, 26 October. Salisbury. For the burgesses of the town of Blaye.
1Order to the seneschal of Gascony to investigate by venerable, good and honest men the thruth on these matters: The burgesses of the town of Blaye Bleyves petitioned the king before him and his council that at the occasion of the wars which took place in the duchy they suffered many damages, so they requested the king to restore the state of the town as well as in help to repair the paving of the town and its fountains to grant them the right to receive for each tun originating from outside the territory of Blaye that pass through Blaye which will not be owned by the burgesses of Blaye or the nobles of the said territory, 2d.st., and for each tun of wine coming from the territory of Blaye 1d.st., and the casks (pipis) of wines can be taxed according to the proportion, with the exceptions of the wines of the burgesses, nobles, abbots of the town and its territory. The seneschal has to send without delay this enquiry to the king under the king's seal in use in the duchy.
By petition of C.
- 1.
- SC 8/290/14454 is a petition of the burgesses of Blaye that is probably at the origin of this entry. They complained that the streets of Blaye were badly paved and that what necessary to keep clean the fountains of the town. As the town had no commune, its inhabitants designated six honnest men to represent the town's interest. And as their houses have been destroyed and they suffered great damages without compensation during the last war of Gascony 2 and the war that took place thirty year ago 3 , they requested the king to perceive on each tun brought to Blaye 2d.st. at the exception of the wine of the burgesses of Blaye and the noble of the territory of Blaye.
- 2.
- The war of St-Sardos, 1324-5.
- 3.
- The war of Gascony, 1294-7.
- 150
-
1 October. Salisbury. For Thomas d'Abingdon (de Bynedon'), burgess of Southampton (Suth').
- 151
-
1 October. Salisbury. For Thomasa, widow of Johan Élies.
Order to the king's seneschals, constables, castellans, prévôts, bayles, ministers and king's liege men of the duchy, as the king took at will in his safeguard Thomasa, widow of Johan Élies Elias, to maintain and protect Thomasa's men, lands, things, revenues and all her legitimate possessions in the duchy from unlawfull injuries and violence according to their competence.
- 152
-
1 October. Windsor. For Master John de Weston, king's constable of Bordeaux.
Order and requirement to the archbishops, bishops, counts, vicomtes, barons, all the nobles and king's liege men in the duchy, as John de Weston, constable of Bordeaux who formerly went from the regions of the duchy to England to the king for some difficult business, then the king sent him back to the regions of the duchy for the exercise of his office and also for some king's business, to advice and help him on this matter.
By p.s.
- 153
-
20 October. Salisbury. For Arnaut de Poulouaout.
Order to the constable of Bordeaux to check the bills and account mentioned there: Arnaut de Poulouaout Pulewaut petitioned the king before him and his council the king owed him 86l. 17s. 4d.t. which are owed to him from the sum of 176l. 17s. 4d.t. which was owed to Poulouaout for the wages of him and his companions, cavalrymen as infantrymen from the time he staid in the service of Edward II and the current king in the regions of the duchy, as it is shown by the bills of the seneschal of the duchy and the current constable; and it is also owed to him 42l. 14s.st. for the wages of him and his men-at-arms and foot serjeants of the time in garrison at the town of Dax Ayques, as it is shown by some account formerly made before Ralph Basset, then seneschal of the duchy, Oliver de Ingham and John Travers made at the king's orders, as Poulouaout asserts it. If the constable notices that these sums of 86l. 17s. 4d.t. and 42l. 14s.st. are owed to the said Poulouaout and pay him as far as he can, receiving the mentioned bills and also his letters of acquittances. The constable will have due allowance in his account.
By petition of C.
- 154
-
26 August. Clipstone. For Pey de Frésapa.
Order to the seneschal of Gascony or his lieutenant to certify the king on these articles under his seal: Pey Frésapa Fresapa petitioned the king before him and his council that Ramon de Mercadiel Merkadiel was accused by some ennemies of the death of Estèbe Donadieu Donedieu and some of his valets at the town of Agen Agen' killed by some malefactors; and John de Weston, then constable of Bordeaux seized Frésapa's goods at this occasion in he king's hand, and the same constable at the order of the then seneschal of Gascony sent himself and other experts in law at the castle of Penne-d'Agenais Penne in Agen' to inquiry of this murder againt the said Mercadiel and this latter has been cleared of the said murder and it was acknoledged that his culpability had been invented, so the said seneschal and constable restored to Mercadiel his goods. But Estèbe [Donadieu], son of the said [murdered]Estèbe Donadieu Dondieu, Arnaut de Noaillac Noylak 1 and Arnaut de Fourques Furkes wanting to treacherously accuse the said Mercadiel and some of his friends caused the imprisonment of a certain clerk for this murder in the prison of the bishop of Agen and forced him by several torments to wrongly accuse of the said murder the said Ramon de Mercadiel, Pey de Frésapa, Guilhem de Frésapa Master Fresapa, Pey de Mercadiel Merkadiel and Lambert Bonnet Bonet and that the said clerk perpetrated this murder at their instigation, thus it is supplicated to the king to provide his grace on this matter. Informed by the seneschal of Gascony, the king will do on that matter what it will be reasonnable to do. In the meantime the seneschal has to suspend the legal proceedings against the defendants.
By petition of C.
- 1.
- There is a medieval castle of Noaillac on the territory of com. Penne-d'Agenais.
- 155
-
20 May. Northampton. For Aubert Mège.
1Order to John de Weston, constable of Bordeaux to check the mentioned indentures and memoranda: Aubert Mège Master Medici, clerk, petitioned the king before him and his council that victuals and other things were delivered on the king's order to him by Weston, constable of Bordeaux and his men, and indentures and memoranda were made on this matter, and these victuals and other things remained in possession of Mège as he said, because the aforesaid Weston denied he made indentures and still unjustly denies it to the great damage of the aforesaid Weston on what this latter petitioned the king to provide a remedy. If the constable notice that the victuals and other things were delivered to Mège according to the indentures and other memoranda, he has not to trouble the aforesaid Mège on this matter in the future.
By petition of C.
- 1.
- Same entry as entry n°93.
- 156
-
Same as above. For the same.
1Order to the seneschal of Gascony or his lieutenant, if John de Weston, constable of Bordeaux or his lieutenant, neglects to obey the king's order on the following matter, to enforce what is just: Master Aubert Mège, clerk, petitioned the king before him and his council that victuals and other things were delivered on the king's order to him by John de Weston, constable of Bordeaux and his men, and indentures and memoranda were made on this matter, and these victuals and other things remained in possession of Mège as he said, because the aforesaid Weston denied he made indentures and still unjustly denies it to the great damage of the aforesaid Weston on what this latter petitioned the king to provide a remedy, and the king ordered the aforesaid Weston to check the said indentures and memoranda.
By petition of C.
- 1.
- Same entry as entry n°80? Just the mentions of the lieutenants of the seneschal and the constable are added. .
- 157
-
1328, 26 November. Westminster. For Bernat Brun.
Announcement that the king confirms the grant at will made by John de Haustede, kt, seneschal of the duchy of Aquitaine by his letters patent, under the king's seal used in the duchy giving the authority to the king's council in these regions, to Bernat Brun Boerum, inhabitant of Boerum Puymirol Grandis Castri of the king's executoria at the same place of Puymirol and in its district, and the king's seal and counter-seal used in these regions for the contracts with all their appartaining revenues.
By p.s.
- 158
-
Same as above. For Pey de Partica, clerk.
Announcement that the king confirms the grant at will made by John de Haustede, kt, seneschal of the duchy of Aquitaine by his letters patent, under the seal used by the king in the regions of the duchy before he governed the kingdom [of England] 1 , to Pey de Partica, clerk, of the scribania of the assizes of the seneschal and juges-mages of Agenais Agennie with all its appartaining revenues from the inquiries and informations, and rights.
By p.s.
- 1.
- The future Edward III was only duke of Aquitaine or Guyenne between 1325 and his accession to the English throne on 24 January 1327.
- 159
-
1328, 10 December. Gloucester. For Arnaut de Durfort.
Order to the seneschal of Gascony and the constable of Bordeaux to have full information on the action of Arnaut de Durfort Duro Forti from the time he was banished from the duchy by Charles [IV], former king of France. Because of this banishment Durfort suffered since many damages and grievances, so the king wants Durfort to be paid of the arrears of wages owed to him from the time he was banished. If they notice that Durfort behave well towards the king after the time of the said banishment, then the constable has to pay to Durfort what is owed to him of the arrears of his wages. The constable will have due allowance in his account.
By p.s.
-
Similar letters have been sent to:
- 159.1
-
Same as above.
Ramon Durand Durandi; Bernat de Béarn called l'Aspès Bearino; Guilhem [de Caumont], lord of Caumont Cavo Monte; Arnaut-Guilhem de Béarn Bearnio, Bearnio lord of Lescun Escunho;
- 159.2
-
Same as above.
Anessans de Caumont Cavo Monte, Cavo Monte lord of Tombeboeuf Tumbabone; Ramon-Bernat de Ste-Foy Sancta Fide, Sancta Fide lord of Lusignan Lesinhano; Bertran Caillau Calculi; Guiraut de Tastes.
- 160
-
Same as above. For Fortaner de Lescun.
Order to the seneschal of Gascony and the constable of Bordeaux to have full information on the action of Fortaner de Lescun: although Fortaner de Lescun Lescuno 1 was not banished from the duchy by the former king of France Charles [IV], it is asserted to the king he behave well towards him. If they notice that Durfort behave well towards the king as it is sais, then the constable has to pay to Durfort what is owed to him of his wages. The constable will have due allowance in his account.
By p.s.
- 1.
- Fortaner de Lescun, lord of Louvigny.
-
Similar letters have been sent to:
- 160.1
-
Same as above.
Guilhem de Galard; Arnaut de Montpezat Monte Pesato; Pey de Moncaut Monte Calvo.
- 161
-
1328, 10 December. Gloucester. For Amaniu [du Foussat], son and heir of Amaniu du Foussat.
Order to the constable of Bordeaux to account with Amaniu [du Foussat], son and heir of Amaniu du Foussat Fossato, the wages owed to his father and him when they were in Edward II and the current king's service as Foussat [son] petitioned the king, and the king wants to help him as he is highly impoverished because of the frequent wars disturbing the duchy. The constable will have due allowance in his account.
By p.s.
- 162
-
12 December. Gloucester. For the mayor and honest men of the king's town of Bourg.
Order to the constable of Bordeaux to account with the mayor and honest men of Bourg Burgh' the wages owed to them from the time they remained in Edward II and the current king's service during in the former wars formerly launched in the duchy. And of what the constable will find, he has to pay them from the revenues of the duchy as far as he can, and as the difficult king's business in these regions will permit it. The constable will have due allowance in his account.
By p.s.